期刊文献+

Comparison of Intraoperative Ultrasound Pachymetry and Postoperative Optical Coherence Tomography of Anterior Segment in the Measurement of Flap Thickness in Eyes Receiving Laser in situ Keratomileusis

Comparison of Intraoperative Ultrasound Pachymetry and Postoperative Optical Coherence Tomography of Anterior Segment in the Measurement of Flap Thickness in Eyes Receiving Laser in situ Keratomileusis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Purpose:To compare the measurement of flap thickness using intraoperative ultrasound pachymetry and postoperative visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (Visante-OCT) in eyes receiving laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods: Seventeen patients (34 eyes) received LASIK using a Technolas-217Z100 laser and AMADEUSⅡ mechanical microkeratome(140 μm head). Flap thickness was assessed with an ultrasound pachymeter intraoperatively and a Visante-OCT postoperatively at 1 week and 1 month. Results: The intraoperative mean flap thickness by ultrasound pachymetry was (124±13.9) μm (range: 96.5 to 160 μm), and mean flap thickness by Visante-OCT was (145±7.13) μm (range: 130 to 158 μm) and (143±5.32) μm (range: 132 to 155 μm) postoperatively at 1 week and 1 month respectively (F=63.52,P<0.01). Intraoperative subtraction pachymetry underestimated flap thickness compared with postoperative Visante-OCT.(P<0.01)..There was no significant difference between postoperative Visante-OCT measurements at 1 week and 1 month after LASIK.(P=0.16). The 95% limit of agreement.(LoA).of flap thickness between ultrasound Visante-OCT and pachymetry was -5.40 to 42.10 μm. Conclusion: OCT overestimates flap thickness compared with intraoperative ultrasound pachymetry when using the AMADEUSⅡ mechanical microkeratome. Purpose: To compare the measurement of flap thickness using intraoperative ultrasound pachymetry and postoperative visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (Visante- OCT) in eyes receiving laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods: Seventeen patients (34 eyes) received LASIK us- ing a Technolas-217Z100 laser and AMADEUS I1 mechanical microkeratome (140 txm head). Flap thickness was assessed with an ultrasound pachymeter intraoperatively and a Visante - OCT postoperatively at 1 week and 1 month. Results: The intraoperative mean flap thickness by ultrasound pachymetry was (124_+13.9) ~m (range: 96.5 to 160 p,m), and mean flap thickness by Visante-OCT was (145_+7.13) p^m (range: 130 to 158 Ixm) and (143_+5.32) p,m (range: 132 to 155 txm) postoperatively at 1 week and 1 month respectively (F=63.52,P〈0.01). Intraoperative subtraction pachymetry un- derestimated flap thickness compared with postoperative Visante-OCT (P〈0.01). There was no significant difference between postoperative Visante-OCT measurements at 1 week and 1 month after LASIK (P--0.16). The 95% limit of agree- ment (LoA)of flap thickness between ultrasound Visante- OCT and pachymetry was -5.40 to 42.10 ~m. Conclusion: OCT overestimates flap thickness compared with intraoperative ultrasound pachymetry when using the A- MADEUS II mechanical microkeratome.
出处 《Eye Science》 2012年第2期60-63,共4页 眼科学报(英文版)
关键词 超声测厚仪 厚度测量 断层扫描 光学相干 角膜 激光 眼睛 原位 cornea flap thicknesS laser in situ keratomileu-sis anterior segment optical coherence tomography ultra-sound pachymeter
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Randleman JB,Russell B,Ward MA,et al.Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK.Ophthal- mology, 2003 ; 110 (2) : 267-275.
  • 2Durairaj VD,Balentine J,Kouyoumdjian G,et al.The predictability of corneal flap thickness and tissue laser ablation in laser in situ keratomileusis.Ophthalmology, 2000; 107(12) : 2140-2143.
  • 3Izatt JA, Hee MR, Swanson EA, et al.Micrometer -scale resolution imaging of the anterior eye in vivo with opti- cal coherence tomography.Arch Ophthalmol,1994;l12 (12) : 1584-1589.
  • 4Li Y, Netto MV, Shekhar R, et al.A longitudinal study of LASIK flap and stromal thickness with high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology,2007; 114(6) : 1124-1132.
  • 5Rocha KM,Randleman JB,Stulting RD.Analysis of mi- crokeratome thin flap architecture using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.J Refract Surg, 2011;27 (10) : 759-763.
  • 6Lackerbauer CA, Kollias A, Kreutzer TC,et al.Amadeus II microkeratome:optimizing microkeratome settings for high flap accuracy using optical low coherence reflec- tometry.Eur J Ophthalmol, 2010; 20( 1 ) : 41--47.
  • 7Jackson DW,Wang L, Koch DD.Accuracy and precision of the amadeus microkeratome in producing LASIK flaps.Cornea, 2003 ; 22 (6) : 504-507.
  • 8Solomon KD,Donnenfeld E,Sandoval HP,et al.Flap thickness accuracy: comparison of 6 microkeratome models.J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004; 30(5) : 964-977.
  • 9Du S,Lian J,Zhang L, et al.Flap thickness variation with 3 types of microkeratome heads.J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011 ;37 ( 1 ) : 144-148.
  • 10Katsube N, Wang R, Okuma E, et al.Biomechanical re- sponse of the cornea to phototherapeutic keratectomy when treated as a fluid-filled porous material. J Refract Surg, 2002 ; 18: S 593-597.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部