期刊文献+

轻质量型网片在中老年疝修补术中的优势 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过轻量型网片与重量型网片的随机对照试验,分析轻量型网片的优势及并发症,评估其应用前景。方法将疝手术病例250例,随机分为重量型网片组(A组)及轻量型网片组(B组),观察术后疼痛、切口区域麻木及异物感、疝复发、体力活动受限或剧烈运动受限等指标,评价两种网片对术后结局的影响。结果①B组和A组在术后近期疼痛不适感发生率及程度上没有区别,远期B组发生率低于A组。②B组在术后早期及远期对体力活动的影响显著小于A组。结论①重量型网片疝修补术后具有疼痛、活动力受限、对体力活动影响大,其应用前景受到影响。②轻量型网片可以改善术后早期及远期的功能结局,轻量型网片可以显著减少对体力活动的影响,具有广阔的应用前景。
出处 《中国老年保健医学》 2012年第3期16-17,共2页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Care
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1中华医学会外科学会疝和腹壁外科学组.成人腹股沟疝、股疝手术治疗方案(修订稿)[J].中华普通外科杂志,2004,19(2):126-126. 被引量:505
  • 2王宁华.疼痛定量评定的进展[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(18):2738-2739. 被引量:461
  • 3G, Bah'at C. Inguinal hernia repair with betaglucan-coated mesh:results at two-year follow up [ J ]. Hernia,2005,9 : 125 - 130.
  • 4Post S. Weiss B. Willer M, et al. Randomized clinical trlaI of light- weight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair[ J]. Bfit J Surg. 2004,91:44 -48.
  • 5Agarwal BB, Agarwal KA, Mahajan KC. Prospective double-blind ran- domized controlled study comparing heavy and lightweight polyprepylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of" inguinal hernia : early re- suits [ J ]. Surg Endosc ,2009,23 : 242 - 247.
  • 6袁喜红,周凯,王俊,洪华章,傅平,李坚.轻质量型网片在老年腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术中的应用[J].中华普通外科杂志,2011,26(2):102-104. 被引量:17
  • 7S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, et al. Three-year resuhs of arandomized clini- cal trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia [ J ]. Br J Surg, 2006, 93 : 1056 - 1059.

二级参考文献18

  • 1许军,刘昶,麻勇.腹股沟疝修补术人工材料感染的防治对策[J].中国实用外科杂志,2006,26(11):828-830. 被引量:69
  • 2[1]FISAHMAN B,PASTERNAK S,WALLENSTEIN SL,et al.The memorial pain assessment card[J].Cancer,1987,60:1151- 1158.
  • 3[2]RHIND VM,BIRD NA, WRIGHT V.A comparison of clinical assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis[J].Annals of the Rheumatic Disease,1980,39:135- 137.
  • 4[3]HUSKISSON EC,JONE J,SCOTT PJ.Application of visual analogue scales to the measurement of functional capacity[J].Rheumatology and Rehabilitation,1976,15:185- 187.
  • 5[4]DOWNIE WW,LEATHAM PA,RHIND VM.Studies with pain rating scales[J].Annals of the Rheumatics Diseases,1978, 37: 378- 381.
  • 6[5]WILKIE D,LOVEJOY N,DODD M,et al.Cancer pain intensity measurement:concurrent validity of three tools- finger dynameter,pain intensity number scale, visual analogue scale[J].Hospice Journal,1990, 6:1- 13.
  • 7[6]MARCHAND S,BUSHNELL MC,DUNCAN GH.Modulation of heat pa- in perception by high frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)[J].Clinical Journal of Pain,1991,1: 122- 129.
  • 8[7]PRICE DD,BUSH FM,LONG S,et al.A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scale[J].Pain,1994, 56: 217- 226.
  • 9[8]JESEN MP,MCFARLAND CA.Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients[J].Pain,1993,55:195- 203.
  • 10[9]RANSFORD AO, CAIRNS D,MOONEY V.The Pain drawing as an aid to the psychological evaluation of patients with low- back pain[J].Spine,1976,1(2):127- 134.

共引文献974

同被引文献61

  • 1Simsons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al.European hernia society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J].Hernia,2009, 13(4):343-403.
  • 2Nikkolo C, Murruste M, Vaasna T, et al. Three-year results of randomised clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernioplasty[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(5):555-559.
  • 3O'Dwyer pJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG,et al.Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair[J].Br J Surg,2005 ,92(2): 166-170.
  • 4Yazdankhah Kenary A, Afshin SN, Ahmadi Amoli H, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for primary inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2013,17(4):471- 477.
  • 5Smietanski M, Bury K, Smietanska lA, et at. Polish Hernia Study G. Five- year results of a randomised controlled multi- centre study comparing heavy- weight knitted versus low- weight, non- woven polypropylene implants in Lichtenstein hernioplasty[J]. Hernia , 2011,15(5):495-501.
  • 6Chowbey PK,Garg N ,Sharma A,et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight meshand heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totallyextraperitoneal groin hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc,2010,24(12): 3073-3079.
  • 7Chui LB,Ng WT,Sze YS,et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in chronic pain incidence after TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernia[l]. Surg Endosc,2010,24(11): 2735-2738.
  • 8Kingsnorth A, LeBlance K. Hernias: Inguinal and incisional[J].Lancet, 2003,362(9395):1561-1571.
  • 9Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M. European HerniaSociety guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adultpatients[J]. Hernia, 2009,13(4) ;343-403.
  • 10Rutkow IM,Robbins AW. Demograhic,classificatory,andsocioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States [J].Surg Clin North Am, 1993,73(3):413-426.

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部