摘要
李徽昭博士在其新作《当下文学批评问题及其理念思考——以陕西本土文学批评为例》中对鄙人《文学批评三足鼎立局面观察》进行了批驳,对陕西本土文学批评进行全盘否定。在徽昭先生眼里,陕西本土文学批评问题多多,诸如批评身份错位、批评意识匮乏等。一句话,将陕西文坛尤其是陕西本土文学批评完全"妖魔化""绝望化"。在此,笔者想和徽昭先生商榷:陕西本土文学研究者到底是"自满"还是"自信"?陕西本土文学研究者与作家关系近了是好事还是坏事?并提出了自己的观点:对接、对话和交响是当下陕西本土文学批评突出重围、与世界文学接轨的关键和基本发展趋势。
Dr. Li Huizhao presents a criticism on my Observation of the Tripod Situation in Literary Criticism in his newly work Problems in Contemporary Literary Criticism and its Rational Reflection --- Taking Literary Criticism on Native Shaanxi Literature as an Exammple, which totally repudiated the criticism on native Shaanxi literary criticism. In the eyes of Mr. Li, there are too much problems in native Shaanxi literary criticism, such as malposition of criticism, lack of criticism conscience. In one word, Shaanxi literature, especially native Shaanxi literature criticism, is a complete "demon" and "desperation". Therefore I want to discuss with Mr.Li: Are native Shaanxi literature researchers "self- contented" or "self-cordldent"? Is it good or bad for native Shaanxi literature researchers to have a close relationship with writers? Here are my viewpoints: interconnection, talk and communication are key factors and development tendency for native Shaanxi literary criticism to make a breakthrough and get connected with world literature.
出处
《商洛学院学报》
2012年第3期34-41,共8页
Journal of Shangluo University
基金
陕西省教育厅专项科研计划项目(11JK0253)
关键词
自信
批评身份
批评效能
对接
对话
交响
self-confidence
criticism identity
criticism effect
interconnection
talk
communication