摘要
本文认为,新破产法对法院的职能定位存在着公权越位和私权错位的立法失误。当前破产法中法院职能应向"去行政化"与"去民事化"方向改革,以实现破产审判职能的理性回归。在"去行政化"改革方面,可以在现行司法行政体系内设置破产管理人监管处(科)的司法行政管理部门,并推行破产管理人执业许可制度;在"去民事化"改革方面,在破产管理人的选任和报酬确定上,则应实行以债权人会议决定为主、人民法院指定为辅的立法模式。
The functional orientation of new bankruptcy law exists offside public rights and proprietary dislocation of legislative faults. The current in the law the function of the bankruptcy court should be Toward reform to "go administration is changed" and "to the civil",in order to realize the bankruptcy reform trial function the rational return.In terms of reform to "go administration is changed" , should be in judicial administrative system installed in bankruptcy administrator supervision (division) in the judicial ad- ministrative departments,and promote bankruptcy administrator practice license system;In terms of reform to "to the civil" ,should determine the creditors" meeting decided to give priority to,the people's court to designate as the auxiliary legislation mode in bankruptcy administrator of the selection and reward.
出处
《行政与法》
2012年第6期75-78,共4页
Administration and Law
关键词
公权越位
私权错位
审判职能
去行政化
去民事化
offside public fights
proprietary dislocation trial function
go administration is changed
to the civil