糖尿病患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术中应用腔镜采集大隐静脉的临床研究

Endoscopic Vein Harvesting in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting:A Prospective Controlled Trial

目的探讨腔镜大隐静脉采集法(endoscopic vein harvesting,EVH)对糖尿病患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后恢复和桥血管再狭窄的影响。方法采用非随机临床对照研究的方法,纳入2010年12月至2012年2月华西医院行冠状动脉旁路移植术合并2型糖尿病的患者,按所采用的静脉桥血管采集方式,将患者分为腔镜大隐静脉采集法(EVH)组和开放大隐静脉采集法(CVH)组,评价两组患者围手术期并发症情况。随访期间采用介入或CT冠状动脉造影评价桥血管再狭窄情况。结果共纳入51例患者,其中EVH组24例,CVH组27例。两组患者年龄、体重、基础病变程度差异均无统计学意义。两组术中体外循环时间和主动脉阻断时间差异均无统计学意义[(67.2±9.8)min vs.(68.3±14.5)min,P>0.05;(62.4±11.3)min vs.(65.2±10.3)min,P>0.05]。两组患者术后主要并发症发生率差异无统计学意义。与CVH比较,EVH能显著缩短桥血管采集时间[(35.6±6.4)minvs.(45.2±11.4)min,P<0.05],降低腿部切口延迟愈合发生率[0.0%(0/24)vs.18.5%(5/27),P<0.05]。CVH组随访9.1个月,EVH组随访9.4个月。随访期间两组并发症(胸痛、大隐静脉再狭窄)发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于合并糖尿病行CABG的患者,EVH是一种安全有效、微创快速的桥血管采集方法。

Objective To evaluate clinical outcomes of endoscopic vein harvesting （EVH） for coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） in diabetic patients. Methods In this prospective non-randomized control study, patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent CABG from December 2010 to Febuary 2012 in West China Hospital were enrolled. Based on different vein graft harvesting technique, these patients were divided into two groups： an EVH group and a conventional vein harvesting （CVH） group. Perioperative complications were compared between the two groups. Interventional or CT coronary angiogram was used to evaluate bypass graft patency during follow-up. Results A total of 51 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in this study with 24 patients in the EVH group and 27 patients in the CVH group. There was no statistical difference in age, weight, and comorbidities between the two groups. There was no statistical difference in cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time between the two groups （67. 2± 9. 8 rain versus 68.3 ± 14. 5 min, P 〈 0.05; 62.4 ±11.3 min versus 65.2± 10. 3 min, P 〉 0. 05）. The vein graft harvesting time （35.6± 6. 4 min versus 45.2 ± 11.4 min, P 〈 0. 05） and rate of delayed leg wound healing （0.0% with 0/24 versus 18.5% with 5/27, P〈0. 05 ） of the EVH group were significantly shorter or lower than those of CVH group.There was no statistical difference in major postoperative complications with respect to venous graft failure rate and chest pain during short term follow-up （9.1 months in the CVH group and 9.4 months in the EVH group） between the two groups. Conclusion EVH is a safe, effective, minimally invasive and quick vein graft harvesting technique for CABG in diabetic patients.