1Kang SM, lee SW, Jeong HJ, et al. Comparison of elective sin- gle cleavage-embryo transfer to elective single blastocyst-embryo transfer in human IVF-ET[ J]. Clin Exp Reprod Med, 2011,38 (1) : 53-60.
2Zander - fox DL, Tremellen K, Lane M. Single blastocyst em- bryo transfer maintains comparable pregnancy rates to double cleavage - stage embryo transfer but resuhs in healthier preg- nancy outcomes[J]. Aust NZ J Obstet Gyn, 2011,51 (5) : 406- 410.
3Kang SM, Lee SW, Jeong HJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of elec- tive single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blasto- cyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET [ J ]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2012: 1-6.
4Yokota Y, Sato S, Yokota M, et al. Successful pregnancy fol- lowing blastocyst vitrification : case report [ J ]. Hum Reprod, 2000,15(8) : 1802-1803.
5Mesut N, Ciray HN, Mesut A, et al. Cryopreservation of blasto- cysts is the most feasible strategy in good responder patients[ J]. Fertil Stefil, 2011 : 1121-126.
6Ishihara O, Kuwahara A, Saitah H. Frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer reduces ectopic pregnancy risk : an analysis of single em- bryo transfer cycles in Japan [ J]. Fertil Steril, 2011 : 1966- 1969.
7Zhu D, Zhang J, Cao S, et al. Vitrified-warmed blastocyst trans- fer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rates com- pared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles-time for a new embryo transfer strategy? [J]. Ferfil Steril, 2011: 1691-1695.
8Milki AA, Hinckley MD, Fisch JD, et al. Comparison of blasto- cyst transfer with day 3 embryo transfer in similar patient popula- tions [ J]. Fertil Steril, 2000,73 ( 1 ) : 126-129.
9Liebermann J. Vitrification of human blastocysts: an update [ J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2009,19 : 105-114.
10Haouzi D, Assou S, Mahmoud K, et al. Gene expression pro- file of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between nat- ural and stimulated cycles for the same patients[ J]. Hum Re- prod, 2009,24(6) : 1436-1445.
