期刊文献+

分根法与去近中阻力法拔除下颌阻生牙的比较 被引量:4

A comparative study of split-root and medial resistance removal in extraction of medially impacted tooth
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较分根拔除法与去近中阻力拔除法在下颌近中中位小角度阻生第三磨牙拔除术中手术时间、术中断根情况、术后并发症方面的差异,探讨分根法在近中阻生牙拔除术中的优点。方法:随机选取40例双侧基本对称的下颌近中中位小角度阻生第三磨牙、全景片显示为多根的男性患者,一侧阻生牙用分根拔除法拔除(分根组),对侧用去近中阻力法拔除(去阻力组),记录2组的手术时间,术中断根情况,术后疼痛程度、肿胀程度及开口受限程度,采用SPSS11.5软件包对数据进行配对t检验。结果:分根组手术时间、断根次数小于去阻力组,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。术后24h,分根组疼痛、肿胀、开口受限程度均小于去阻力组,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。术后72h,分根组仅开口受限程度小于去阻力组,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。术后120h,2组各种术后并发症无统计学差异。结论:对于多根的下颌中位近中小角度阻生牙,分根拔除术较去近中拔除术手术时间短,断根几率小,术后并发症轻。 PURPOSE: To compare the operating time, root fracture and postoperative complications between split-root extraction and medial resistance removal in extraction of mandibular small-angle impacted third molars, to evaluate the advantages of split-root extraction in medially impacted tooth extraction. METHODS: Forty male patients with bilaterally mandibular medial small-angle impacted third molars, having multiple roots in panoramic films, were selected. The impacted teeth on one side were extracted by using split-root method, while the similar impacted teeth on the other side were extracted by using medial resistance removal method. The operating time, root fracture, postoperative pain, facial edema, and mouth opening were recorded. SPSS11.5 software package was used and paired t test was performed to analyze the data. RESULTS: There were significant differences in operating time and root fracture between the two methods (P〈 0.05). In the split-root group, the operating time was shorter and root fracture were less. After 24 hours, facial edema, limited mouth opening, and pain of the split-root group was less severe than that of the medial resistance removal group, differences were significant (P〈0.05). After 72 hours, limited mouth opening of the split-root group was milder than that of the resistance removal group, the difference was significant (/~〈0.05). After 120 hours, there was no significant difference of any complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In extraction of mandibular medial small-angle impacted third molars with multiple roots, the operating time of split-root extraction is shorter. The root fracture possibility of splitroot extraction is smaller, and postoperative complications are less common.
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期344-349,共6页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
基金 浙江省科技厅公益项目(2010C33124)~~
关键词 分根法 去近中阻力法 近中阻生牙 Split-root Medial resistance removal Medially impacted tooth
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1邱蔚六;张震康;张志愿.口腔颌面外科学[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,200875-98.
  • 2Erdogan O,Tath U,(U)stün Y. Influence of two different flap designs on the sequelae of mandibular third molar surgery[J].Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,2011,(03):147-152.
  • 3Deepti C,Rehan HS,Mehra P. Changes in quality of life after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar teeth[J].J Maxillofac Oral Surg,2008,(03):257-260.
  • 4周宏志,胡开进.下颌第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛的临床分析及预防[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2010,28(2):153-157. 被引量:55
  • 5汪义永,陈凌,魏斌.“T”型截冠法在水平阻生牙拔除中的临床应用[J].中国医药导报,2010,7(11):137-137. 被引量:6
  • 6Zandi M. Comparison of corticosteroids and rubber drain for reduction of sequelae after third molar surgery[J].Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,2008,(01):29-33.
  • 7Bui CH,Seldin EB,Dodson TB. Types,frequeneies and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction[J].Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,2003,(12):1379-1389.
  • 8周宏志,胡开进,秦瑞峰,孔亮.下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度预判[J].口腔医学研究,2009,25(3):327-329. 被引量:26
  • 9Olmedo-Gaya MV,Vallecillo-Capilla M,Galvez-Mateos R. Relation of patient and surgical variables to postoperative pain and inflammation in the extraction of third molars[J].Medicina Oral,2002,(05):360-369.
  • 10Reuton T,Smeeton N,McGurk M. Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery[J].British Dental Journal,2001,(11):607-610.

二级参考文献34

  • 1翁素清,张贺志.对羧基苄胺明胶海绵预防下颌阻生智齿拔除术后干槽症[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1996,14(3):241-241. 被引量:6
  • 2Garc′ia-Garc′ia A,Gude Sampedro F,G′andara Rey J,et al.Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2000,83:585-587.
  • 3Diniz-Freitas M,Lago-Mendez L,Gude-Sampedro F,et al.Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,45(1):23-26.
  • 4Susarla SM,Dodson TB.Preoperative computed tomography imaging in the management of impacted mandibular third molars[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65(1):83-88.
  • 5Gbotolorun OM,Arotiba GT,Ladeinde AL.Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65(10):1977-1983.
  • 6Susarla SM,Dodson TB.How well do clinicians estimate third molar extraction difficulty[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2005,63(2):191-199.
  • 7Yuasa H,Kawai T,Sugiura M.Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2002,40(1):26-31.
  • 8耿温琦.高速涡轮机在拔下颌阻生智齿时的应用.中华口腔杂志,1983,18(4):212-212.
  • 9Finne K,Klamfeidt A.Removal of lower third molar germs by lateraltrepanation and conventional technique.A comparative study[J].Int J Oral Surg,1981,10(4):251.
  • 10Szmyd L,Shannon IL,Schuessler CF,et al.Air turbine in impactedthird molar Surgery[J].J Oral Anesth Hosp Dent Serv Surg,1963.18(4):212.

共引文献169

同被引文献46

  • 1乔桂花,卜英江.碘仿治疗干槽症疗效的观察[J].山西医药杂志,2005,34(4):346-346. 被引量:2
  • 2张志愿主编.口腔颌面外科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:121.
  • 3Baqain ZH, Karaky AA, Sawair F, et al. Frequency estimates and risk factors for postoperative morbidity after third molar removal: a prospective cohort study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2008,66(11): 2276-2283.
  • 4Nageshwar, Comma incision for impacted mandibular third molars[J]. J Oral Maxillofae Surg, 2002, 60(12): 1506-1509.
  • 5Erdogan O, Tath U, Usttin Y, et al. Influence of two different flap designs on the sequelae of mandibular third molar surgery [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 15(3): 147-152.
  • 6Suarez-Cunqueiro MM, Gutwald R, Reichman J, et al. Marginal flap versus paramarginal flap in impacted third molar surgery: a prospective study [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radial Endod, 2003, 95(4): 403-408.
  • 7Alkan A, Metin M, Arici S, et al. A prospective randomised cross-over study of the effect of local haemostasis after third molar surgery on facial swelling: an exploratory trial [J]. Br Dent J, 2004, 197(1): 42-44.
  • 8Baqain ZH, Al-Shafii A, Hamdan AA, et al. Flap design and mandibular third molar surgery: a split mouth randomized clinical study [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 41(8): 1020-1024.
  • 9Kirk DG, Liston PN, Tong DC, et al. Influence of two different flap designs on incidence of pain, swelling, trismus, and alveolar osteitis in the week following third molar surgery [J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radial Endod, 2007, 104(1): e1-6.
  • 10Brignglio F, Zenobio EG, Isola G, et al. Complications in surgieal removal of impacted mandibular third molars in relation to flap design: clinical and statistical evaluations [J]. Quintessence Int, 2011, 42 (6): 445-453.

引证文献4

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部