期刊文献+

不同液体治疗方案用于腹腔镜下乙状结肠原位新膀胱术的临床效果 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较不同液体治疗方案用于腹腔镜下乙状结肠原位新膀胱术的临床效果。方法择期行腹腔镜下全膀胱切除并乙状结肠原位新膀胱术患者64例,分为3组:A组输入约3∶1的晶体和胶体液,B组输入约1∶3晶体和胶体液,C组全为胶体液。记录麻醉前(T0)、麻醉后(T1)、切皮(T2)、切除膀胱后(T3)、术毕(T4)、术后24 h(T5)及48 h(T6)各时点心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、脉搏血氧饱和度、中心静脉压(CVP)和手术前后血红蛋白、凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、血浆肌酐(Cr)、尿素氮(BUN)水平及麻醉时间、术中输液量、输血例数、输血量、出血量、尿量、术后排便时间、术后并发症发生率和术后住院时间。结果 A组输液总量较多,且T5时点HR较其他两组增快(P<0.05),T1、T5时点MAP较其他两组低(P<0.05)。B组T3~T5及C组T2~T6时点CVP较A组显著升高(P<0.05)。B、C组术后PT及APTT延长(P<0.05),其中术后APTT与A组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。B组术后BUN升高(P<0.05)。C组术后Cr及BUN升高,且BUN与A组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但上述各指标变化均处于临床合理范围。结论 3种液体治疗方案均可维持循环稳定,术后并发症及住院时间无显著差异,但需注意输入晶体液比例过高有一过性有效血容量不足的风险,大量胶体液可对凝血功能、血浆Cr及BUN水平产生不良影响。
出处 《广东医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期1793-1795,共3页 Guangdong Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1MICHAEL G M. Postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction: an overview of causes and management strategies[ J]. Clev Clin J Med, 2009, 76(4) : S66 -S71.
  • 2ASFAR P, DE B D, MEIER H A, et al. Clinical review: influ- ence of vasoactive and other therapies on intestinal and hepatic cir- culations in patients with septic shock [ J ]. Crit Care, 2004, 8 (3) : 170-179.
  • 3刘民强,李凤仙,刘中杰,许睿,梁启波,徐世元.不同麻醉方式用于老年患者腹腔镜乙状结肠原位新膀胱术的临床效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2011,27(9):864-866. 被引量:8
  • 4ZAAR M, LAURITZEN B, SECHER N H, et al. Initial adminis- tration of hydroxyethyl starch vs lactated Ringer after liver trauma in the pig[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2009, 102(4) : 221 -226.
  • 5ALEXEY A S, RAILI T S, ANNE H K, et al. Comparison of the effect of 6% hydroxyethyl starch and gelatine on cardiac and stroke volume index: a randomized, controlled trial after cardiac surgery [J]. Perfusion, 2010, 25(5) : 283 -291.
  • 6CHRISTIANE S H, MICHAEL B, KONRAD R. Review article: the efficacy and safety of colloid resuscitation in the critically Ⅲ [J]. Anesth Analg, 2011, 112(1) : 156 - 164.
  • 7CHRISTIANE S H, MAITHIAS K, KONRAD R. A systematic re- view of third - generation hydmxyethy| starch ( HES 130/0.4) in resuscitation: safety not adequately addressed[ J]. Anesth Analg, 2011, 112(3) : 635 -645.
  • 8CHRISTIAN J W, STEFAN D, LUIGI U G, et al. Hyperoncotic colloids and acute kidney injury : a meta - analysis of randomized trials[J]. Critical Care, 2010, 14(5) : R191.
  • 9BRIENZA N, GIGLIO M T, MARUCCI M, et al. Does periopera- rive hemodynamic optimization protect renal function in surgical patients? A meta - analytic study [ J ]. Crit Care Med, 2009, 37 (6) : 2079 - 2090.
  • 10JIN S L, YU B W. Effects of acute hypervolemic fluid infusion of hydroxyethyl starch and gelatin on hemostasis and possible mecha- nisms[J]. Cliu Appl Thromb Hemost, 2010, 16(1 ) : 91 -98.

二级参考文献5

  • 1Seller Losada JM, Sifre Julio C, Ruiz Gareia V. Combined general-epidural anesthesia compared to general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of morbidity and mortali- ty and analgesic efficacy in thoracoabdominal surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 2008, 55 : 360-366.
  • 2Grabowski JE, Talamini MA. Physiological effects of pneumo- peritoneum. J Gastrointest Surg, 2009, 13:1009-1016.
  • 3Kuramochi K, Osuga Y, Yano T, et al. Usefulness of epi- dural anesthesia in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery for infer- tility in comparison to general anesthesia. Surg Endosc,2004, 18 : 847-851.
  • 4Glushchenko VA, Vasil'ev IaI, Varganov ED. Combined spi- nal epidural anesthesia in abdominal surgery. Anesteziol Rean- imatol, 2007 (3): 25 -27.
  • 5Li Y, Zhu S, Yan M. Combined general/epidural anesthesia (ropivacaine 0. 375 %) versus general anesthesia for upper ab- dominal surgery. Anesth Analg, 2008, 106:1562-1565.

共引文献7

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部