期刊文献+

组织变革背景下团队主动性的结构与测量 被引量:1

The Structure and Measurement of Team Initiative under Organizational Change Background
下载PDF
导出
摘要 旨在探索组织变革背景下团队主动性行为的结构,并开发出相应的测量工具。首先对20家企业的27位高管进行了深度访谈,然后按照扎根理论思路对获取资料进行细致分析,探索团队主动性的结构,再按照严格的心理测量学程序开发团队主动性的测量问卷,并以来自60家企业的70个团队(共292位成员)为对象进行了测验。研究发现:团队主动性的主要维度包括群策、协作和适应。经过探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析,结果表明测量工具有着良好的信度和构思效度。 This study aimed at exploring the structure of team initiative under the organizational change background and consequently developing a measurement tool. Firstly, 27 TMT members from 20 enterprises were surveyed with interviews. Then the ground theory methods were used to explore the construct of team initiative. Secondly, a questionnaire of team initiative was developed ac- cording to the psychological metric procedures. The sample consisted of 292 members from 70 teams of 60 enterprises. The data analysis proved that team initiative was a collective construct, and one of the most impor- tant group dynamics under organizational change. Its three typical characters were team-driven, collaboration and adaptation. The tests of EFA and CFA demonstrat- ed that the initiative questionnaire has good reliability and construct validity.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2012年第1期67-74,共8页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目资助(71102115 71102114)
关键词 组织变革 团队主动性 构思效度 organizational change, team initiafive, construct validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1陈向明.扎根理论的思路和方法[J].教育研究与实验,1999(4):58-63. 被引量:1010
  • 2Armenakis, A. A. , & Bedeian, A. G. (1999) . Organiza- tional change:A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25,293 - 315.
  • 3Beck, N. , Bruderl, J. , & Woywode, M. (2008). Mo- mentum or deceleration? Theoretical and methodolog- ical reflections on the analysis of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 51,413 - 435.
  • 4Corbin,J. M. , & Strauss, A. ( 1990). Grounded theory research : Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13,3 - 21.
  • 5Frese, M. , & Fay, D. ( 2001 ) . Personal initiative : An active perfomamlce concept for work in the 21st cen- tury. Research ir- Orgar-izational Behavior,23,133- 187.
  • 6Frese, M. , & Garst, H. ( 2007 ). Making things happen : Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psy- cho/ogy,92, 1084 - 1102.
  • 7Frese, M., K_ring, W. , & Soose, A. ( 1996). Personal initiative at work : Differences between east and westGermany. Academy of Management Journal, 39,37 - 63.
  • 8Frese, M. ,Teng, E. ,& Wijnen, C. J. D. (1999) .Help- ing to improve suggestion systems :Predictors of giving suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior,20, 1139 - 1155.
  • 9Glascr, B. G. (2001). The ground theory perspective : Conceptualization with description. Mill Valley: Soci- ology PreSs.
  • 10llgen, D. R., John;R, & Michael, J. ( 2005 ).Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psycholo- gy,56,517 - 543.

共引文献1009

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部