期刊文献+

公共外交的模式新探——基于动机、手段和效果的划分标准

New Researches on the Mode of Public Diplomacy——Based on Categorical Standards of the Motives,Means and Effects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公共外交作为对传统外交的有效补充,是一国全方位外交格局的重要组成部分。在学理层面上,可以从三个不同的划分标准展开对公共外交模式的探讨:依据动机标准分为主动式和被动式,依据手段标准分为外推型和内引型,依据效果标准分为建设性和破坏性,由此构成了对公共外交行为流程的整体考察。无论是何种公共外交模式,其目标都是增强国家软实力,提升国家形象,维护国家利益。为改善国际舆论环境,实现更好更快的和平发展,中国亟需提升灵活运用多种公共外交模式的能力,创设出一套多种模式协调统一的"巧公共外交"系统。 As an effective complement to traditional diplomacy, public diplomacy is an important part of multi - faceted diplomatic pattern for a country. On the academic level, we can discuss public diplomacy modes from three different categorical standards. According to the standard of means, the modes are divided into active and passive modes. According to the standard of means, the modes are divided into foreign - oriented and incoming modes. According to the standard of effects, the modes are divided into constructive and destructive modes. Thus these researches is tantamount to an comprehensive review of public diplomacy behavior process. No mat- ter what kind of public diplomacy mode, is concerned its objective is to enhance the soft national power, to pro- mote national image and to safeguard national interests. To improve China' s international public opinion envi- ronment and achieve better and faster peaceful development, China needs to promote the capability to flexibly use various modes and create a "smart public diplomacy" system to coordinate and use concerted by various modes.
作者 王冲
机构地区 暨南大学
出处 《太平洋学报》 CSSCI 2012年第5期43-52,共10页 Pacific Journal
关键词 公共外交 动机 手段 效果 和平发展 public diplomacy motive mean effect peaceful development
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献145

  • 1毛维准,阙天舒.灾难外交:一种新的外交方式?——印度洋地震海啸启示录[J].世界经济与政治,2005(6):55-60. 被引量:16
  • 2张乃和.近代英国法人观念的起源[J].世界历史,2005(5):45-55. 被引量:17
  • 3刘霏.灾难外交:中国外交发展中的一种新选择[J].安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版),2005,24(6):45-48. 被引量:3
  • 4Allen C. Hansen, USIA : Public Diplomacy in the Computer Age, New York: Praeger, 1989, p. 174, p. 176,p. 176.
  • 5[法]路易·多洛.《国际文化关系》,上海人民出版社1987年版,第27页.
  • 6Andrew Vincent. Theories of the State [ M ]. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
  • 7Martin Wight. Why is there no International Theory? [ J ]. International Relations (Volume 2), 1960 (1).
  • 8W. W. Buckland, Arnold D. McNair. Roman Law and Common Law: A Comparison in Outline [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.
  • 9C. H. Williams. English Historical Documents, 1485- 1558[Z]. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1967.
  • 10秦亚青.权力·制度·文化[C].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.

共引文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部