期刊文献+

“赋者古诗之流”说的讽诵特质——兼谈诗人之赋与辞人之赋的本质区别 被引量:1

Intoning Trait of the Comment that Fu is the Same Rank of Poems Composed by Ancient Scholars
下载PDF
导出
摘要 历来对"赋者古诗之流"一语的解释,往往强调了赋的讽谏功能,但忽略了赋在形式上的声调节奏。诗与赋其实都是通过悦耳的形式来陈述讽谏之义的,这才是"赋者古诗之流"一语的全面涵义。汉赋依然重诵读,但同时受到稗官小说等口头伎艺的影响,逐渐散失了讽谏的功用,从而产生了诗人之赋与辞人之赋的分别。 The interpretations of the comment that Fu is the same rank of the poems composed by ancient scholars have always emphasized the admonitory faction of Fu, but ignored its form of tone and rhythm. Actually, both poem and Fu in ancient time state admonitions through a musical and pleasant way, and then this,is the com- plete meaning of the comment. In Han dynasty, Fu is still paid much attention to its intonation. In addition, Fu accepts the influence of oral arts and gradually loses its admonitory faction, thus it leads to the difference between Fu of poem and diction.
作者 马燕鑫
出处 《辽东学院学报(社会科学版)》 2012年第3期44-47,共4页 Journal of Liaodong University:Social Science Edition
关键词 古诗 诵读 讽谏 口头伎艺 Fu ancient poem intonation admonition oral art
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1刘光民.《逸周书》中的一篇战国古赋[J].文史知识,1995(12):98-102. 被引量:6
  • 2汉·司马迁.史记[O].北京:中华书局,1959.
  • 3吴广平.楚辞全解[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2008:2.
  • 4[清] 严可均.全晋文[O].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
  • 5郁沅,张明高.魏晋南北朝两汉文论选[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1999.
  • 6[清] 严可均.全梁文[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
  • 7汉·郑玄,注.[唐]贾公彦,疏.周礼注疏[O]//十三经注疏本.北京:中华书局,1979,影印本.
  • 8黄怀信.逸周书校注补释[M].西安:西北大学出版社,1996.
  • 9梁·刘勰,撰.范文澜,注.文心雕龙注[O].北京:人民文学出版社,1958.
  • 10冯沅君.汉赋与古优[M].重庆:群益出版社,1943.

共引文献4

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部