期刊文献+

Energy-based numerical models for assessment of soil liquefaction 被引量:7

Energy-based numerical models for assessment of soil liquefaction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This study presents promising variants of genetic programming (GP), namely linear genetic programming (LGP) and multi expression programming (MEP) to evaluate the liquefaction resistance of san- dy soils. Generalized LGP and MEP-based relationships were developed between the strain energy density required to trigger liquefaction (capacity energy) and the factors affecting the liquefaction characteristics of sands. The correlations were established based on well established and widely dispersed experimental results obtained from the literature. To verify the applicability of the derived models, they were employed to estimate the capacity energy values of parts of the test results that were not included in the analysis. The external validation of the models was verified using statistical criteria recommended by researchers. Sensitivity and parametric analyses were performed for further verification of the correlations. The results indicate that the proposed correlations are effectively capable of capturing the liquefaction resistance of a number of sandy soils. The developed correlations provide a significantly better prediction performance than the models found in the literature. Furthermore, the best LGP and MEP models perform superior than the optimal traditional GP model. The verification phases confirm the efficiency of the derived correlations for their general application to the assessment of the strain energy at the onset of liquefaction. This study presents promising variants of genetic programming (GP), namely linear genetic programming (LGP) and multi expression programming (MEP) to evaluate the liquefaction resistance of san- dy soils. Generalized LGP and MEP-based relationships were developed between the strain energy density required to trigger liquefaction (capacity energy) and the factors affecting the liquefaction characteristics of sands. The correlations were established based on well established and widely dispersed experimental results obtained from the literature. To verify the applicability of the derived models, they were employed to estimate the capacity energy values of parts of the test results that were not included in the analysis. The external validation of the models was verified using statistical criteria recommended by researchers. Sensitivity and parametric analyses were performed for further verification of the correlations. The results indicate that the proposed correlations are effectively capable of capturing the liquefaction resistance of a number of sandy soils. The developed correlations provide a significantly better prediction performance than the models found in the literature. Furthermore, the best LGP and MEP models perform superior than the optimal traditional GP model. The verification phases confirm the efficiency of the derived correlations for their general application to the assessment of the strain energy at the onset of liquefaction.
出处 《Geoscience Frontiers》 SCIE CAS 2012年第4期541-555,共15页 地学前缘(英文版)
关键词 Soil liquefaction Capacity energy Linear genetic programming Multi expression programming SAND FORMULATION Soil liquefaction Capacity energy Linear genetic programming Multi expression programming Sand Formulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Francone,F.D,Deschaine.L.M. Extending the boundaries of design optimization by integrating fast optimization techniques with machine-code-based,linear genetic programming[J].Information Sciences,2004.99-120.
  • 2Pijush Samui.Seismic liquefaction potential assessment by using relevance vector machine[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2007,6(4):331-336. 被引量:5
  • 3Banzhaf,M,Francone,F.D,Nordin,P. The effect of extensive use of the mutation operator on generalization in genetic programming using sparse data sets[A].Berlin,Germany,1996.300-309.
  • 4Refaeilzadeh,P,Tang,L,Liu,H. Cross validation[A].2009.532-538.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Bishop C.Neural Networks for PatternRecognition[]..1995
  • 2Goh ATC."Neural-network Modeling of CPT Seismic Liquefaction Data,"[].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering.1996
  • 3Juang CH,Chen CJ,and Tien YM."AppraisingCone Penetration Test Based Liquefaction ResistanceEvaluation Methods: Artifi cial Neural NetworkApproach,"[].Canadian Geotechnical Journal.1999
  • 4Liao SSC,Veneziano D,and Whitman RV."Regression Models for Evaluating Liquefaction Probability,"[].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering.1988
  • 5MathWork Inc.Matlab User’s Manual, Version 5.3[]..1999
  • 6Seed HB,and Idriss IM."Analysis of Soil Liquefaction: Niigata Earthquake, "[].J Soil Mech and Foun Div.1967
  • 7Seed HB,Tokimatsu K,Harder LF,and Chung RM."In? uence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluation,"[].Rep No UCB/EERC-/ Calif: Earthquake Engrg Res Ctr.1984
  • 8Toprak S,Holzer TL,Bennett MJ,and Tinsley JC.‘‘CPT- and SPT-based Probabilistic Assessment of Liquefaction,’’[].Proc th US–Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Counter measures against Liquefaction.1999
  • 9Youd TL,and Noble SK.‘‘Magnitude Scaling Factors,’’[].Proc NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils Nat Ctr for Earthquake Engrg Res.1997
  • 10Youd TL,and Noble SK.‘‘Liquefaction Criteria Based on Statistical and Probabilistic Analyses,’’[].Proc NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils Nat Ctr for Earthquake Engrg Res.1997

共引文献4

同被引文献20

引证文献7

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部