期刊文献+

英美法律隐喻研究述评 被引量:8

A Comment on Legal Metaphors in the Common Law System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从英美法系法律隐喻的研究现状入手,通过对法律隐喻话语作用的阐述,分析了法律隐喻五个方面的说服功能,指出了其所具有的意识形态功能。法官选择法律隐喻这种话语结构,其实就是拥有权利和占支配地位的社会群体通过对话语的操纵,将自己对社会真实的解释和社会真实的特定意义加之于其他社会群体的能力,因此法律是隐喻成为社会现实的重要语境,隐喻是实现法律话语说服功能的重要手段之一。 Traditionally, jurists of the common law system inherently depreciated legal metaphors while frequently employing them. This situation has changed ereasingly , with the positive function of legal metaphors being inemphasized. The article, after presenting the author' s research on legal metaphors in the common law system, analyzes the persuasive functions of legal metaphors and points out their ideological functions, which enable judges, in their power and dominant position, to manipulate the legal discourse and to impose their interpretation of social reality on other groups. Therefore, law is the major area where metaphor is made real, and metaphor is one of the most important tools to realize persuasiveness of legal discourse.
作者 杨德祥
出处 《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期125-133,共9页 Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
关键词 英美法系 隐喻 说服 the common law system, metaphor, persuasiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1束定芳:《隐喻学研究》,上海:上海外语教育出版社,2003年,第1-2页.
  • 2Mark Johnson,Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor,Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,1981,p.12.
  • 3David T.Ritchie,“Who is on the Outside Looking in,and What do They See?Metaphors of Exclusion in Legal Educa-tion,”MERCER Law Review,Vol.58,2007,p.991.
  • 4See Thomas Ross,“Metaphor and Paradox,”Geogia Law Review,Vol.23,1989,pp.1053-1057.
  • 5See Thomas Ross,Metaphor and Paradox,pp.1053,1057.
  • 6Jeremy Bentham,The Theory of Legislation,C.K.Ogden ed.,1931,p.69.
  • 7Berkey v.Third Ave.R.R.Co.,155 N.E.58,61(N.Y.1926).
  • 8Lon L.Fuller,Legal Fictions,Stanford:Stanford University Press,1967,p.121.
  • 9Robert Tsai,supra note 5.
  • 10Stephen L.Carter,“Religious Freedom as if Religion Matters:A Tribute to Justice Brennan,”California Law Review,Vol.87,1999,pp.1059-1063.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Francis,G.Corpus-driven Grammar and Its Relevance to the Learning of English in a Cross-cultural Situation[A].In A.Pakir (ed.)English In Education:Multicultural Perspective.Singapore:Unipress,1995.
  • 2Halliday,M.A.K.& Matthissen,C.M.Construing Experience Through Meaning:A Language-based Approach to Cognition[M].London and NewYork:Continuum,1999.
  • 3Halliday,M.A.K.& Ruqaiya Hasan.Language,Context and Text:Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective[M].Oxforrd University Press,1985.
  • 4Koller,V.Metaphor Clusters,Metaphor Chains:Analyzing the Multifunctionality of Metaphor in Text[J].metaphorik de 05/2003:115-134.
  • 5Krashen,S.The Pleasure Hypothesis[A].in James E.Alatis (ed.)Georgetown Round Table on Languages and Linguistics[M].1994.Washington,D.C.:Georgetown University Press,1994:299-322.
  • 6Lakoff,G.The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor[A].in Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.)Cambridge:CUP,1993
  • 7Lakoff,G.& Johnson,M.Metaphor We Live By[M].Chicago:The University of,1980.
  • 8Langacker,R.W.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol.Ⅱ)[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press.1991.
  • 9Martin,J.R.&Rose,D.Working With Discourse[M].London/New York Continuum,2003.
  • 10Martin,J.R.& White,P.R.R.Language of Evaluation[M].Hampshire:Palgrave Macmillan,2005.

共引文献32

同被引文献44

引证文献8

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部