期刊文献+

国际班轮运输业反垄断豁免政策和立法之态势与启示——欧盟1419/2006号规则生效后的考察 被引量:3

Situation and enlightenment for policies and legislations on antitrust exemption for liner shipping:an investigation after enforcement of EU Regulation No.1419/2006
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解欧盟1419/2006号规则生效后主要航运国家和地区的班轮运输反垄断豁免政策和立法的发展,并希望有助于确定我国的相关政策和立法,选取欧盟、美国和日本进行比较研究和量化分析,总结业界反应、立法动态以及竞争方式的发展,认为给予班轮公会等定价协议反垄断豁免在一定时期仍将是主流,但联营体等运营协议的合作方式将成为国际班轮运输合作的主要形式.对于中国而言,马上取消公会的豁免未必是最好的选择,应当以有效竞争为目标,采取灵活和科学的制度设计以及建立起全面的竞争法律制度将更有利于市场良性发展. For a better understanding of policy and legislation developments on antitrust exemption for lin- er shipping in the major shipping countries/districts since the enforcement of EU Regulation No. 1419/ 2006, and in the hope that it will help to determine the related policy and legislation in China, EU, USA and Japan are chosen for the comparative and quantitative research, and the controversies among stake- holders, the statutory developments and the competitive modes are summarized. It is concluded that liner conferences may still enjoy rate-making or rate discussion agreement antitrust exemption in certain period, but the consortium operation agreement will be the main modes for cooperation in a long run. As for China, it is not the best choice to repeal the exemption for liner conference in a sudden. Instead, with the aim of efficient competitiveness, a more flexible, scientific and systematic regulatory designing will be more favorable to shape a healthy shipping market.
出处 《上海海事大学学报》 北大核心 2012年第2期76-82,共7页 Journal of Shanghai Maritime University
基金 上海市科学技术委员会"浦江人才"项目(09PJD025) 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(09YS259)
关键词 班轮公会 反垄断豁免 航运 中国立法 liner conference antitrust exemption shipping Chinese legislation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献8

  • 1Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Competition policy in liner shipping[ R ]. 2002.
  • 2Federal Maritime Commission. 45th annual report for fiscal year 2006[R]. 2006.
  • 3European Commission. Annex to the white paper on the review of regulation 4056/86, applying the EC competition rules to maritime transport ( background working paper of the Commission services ) [R]. 2004.
  • 4European Commission. White paper on the review of regulation 4056/1986, applying the EC competition rules to maritime transport[R] . 2003.
  • 5Federal Maritime Commission. The impact of the ocean shipping reform act of 1998 [ R] 2001 : 25.
  • 6Erasmus University. Final report prepared for European Commission competition DG services/tranrsport[R]. 2003: 95-96.
  • 7Productivity Commission. International liner cargo shipping: a review of part X of the trade practices act 1974[R]. 1999.
  • 8Productivity Commission. Draft report: 2004 review of part X of the trade practices act 1974 : international liner cargo shipping[R]. 2004.

共引文献9

同被引文献86

  • 1何治中.纵向垄断协议规制——美国、欧盟比较研究与借鉴[J].金陵法律评论,2011(2):125-133. 被引量:15
  • 2张影.价格合谋的识别与规制——基于反垄断法视角的分析[J].海峡法学,2013,15(3):49-54. 被引量:2
  • 3朱意秋,张琦.我国集装箱班轮运输市场垄断程度研究[J].上海船舶运输科学研究所学报,2006,29(2):137-142. 被引量:5
  • 4[美]乌戈.马太:《比较法律经济学》,沈宗灵译,北京大学出版社2005年版.
  • 5[德]迪特尔·梅迪库斯.《德国债法总论》[M].法律出版社,2004年.第545页.
  • 6[加]Peter Benson主编.《合同法理论》.易继明译.北京大学出版社,2004年版.第58页.
  • 7DOI M,OHTA H, ITOH H. A Theoretical Analysis of Liner Shipping Conferences and Strategic Alliances [J]. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies. 2000, 12 (3): 228-249.
  • 8KROZER J, MASS K, KOTHUIS B. Demonstration of Environmentally Sound and Cost-Effective Shipping [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production.2003,11 ( 7 ): 767-177.
  • 9[美]罗伯特·A.希尔曼:《合同法的丰富性:当代合同法理论的分析与批判》,郑云端译,北京大学出版社2005年版,第80-81页.
  • 102014年9月最高人民法院公布十大海事审判典型案例.http://www.ccmt.org.cn/showws.php?id=5311.2016-02-21.

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部