期刊文献+

人工髋关节无菌性松动失效的生物力学分析与诊断推理 被引量:9

Biomechanical analysis and reasoning on aseptic loosening failure after total hip arthroplasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究人工髋关节置换术后无菌性松动失效的力学机理以及引发松动的具体原因,提出对临床中发生无菌性松动事件进行失效诊断的具体方法。方法从骨水泥层强度、界面微动、应力遮挡、磨损与骨溶解等生物力学角度对无菌性松动的成因进行研究,分析无菌性松动失效与产品、临床和患者等因素的关系,并研究翻修术前检测松动的方法。结果提出无菌性松动失效原因推理路线图,成功利用荧光透视分析(fluoroscopic analysis,FSA)技术在翻修术前对无菌性松动进行了在体测定。结论无菌性松动失效分析推理路线图可以帮助展开失效事件的原因挖掘,应用FSA方法可以对松动进行在体测定与确认,辅助医生开展人工髋关节置换术后无菌性松动失效的诊治。 Objective To propose some detailed methods for diagnosis of aseptic loosening failure in clinic by studying the mechanical mechanism and the specific causes of aseptic loosening failure after the total hip arthro- plasty (THA). Methods The causes of aseptic loosening were investigated from the view of biomechanics, such as strength of the bone cement layer, interface fretting, stress shielding, wear and osteolysis; the relationships between aseptic loosening failure and products, clinical and patient factors were analyzed; the method to detect loosening before the revision surgery was also studied. Results The reasoning route for aseptic loosening failure analysis after THA was proposed, and detection of aseptic loosening with fluoroscopic analysis (FSA) technique before the revision surgery was conducted successfully. Conclusions The reasoning route for aseptic loosening failure analysis can help to discover reasons of failure occurrence. Loosening can be detected and confirmed in vivo by FSA method, which can also assist the clinician for diagnosis and treatment of aseptic loosening after the THA.
出处 《医用生物力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期251-257,共7页 Journal of Medical Biomechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30810103908,81171707) 上海市科学技术委员会基金项目(09441900300)
关键词 全髋关节置换术 无菌性松动 荧光透视分析 生物力学 Total hip arthroplasty(THA) Aseptic loosening Fluoroscopic analysis (FSA) Biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual report 2000 version EB/OL. Http://www. jru. orthop, gu. se.
  • 2The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, the Norwegian Cruci- ate Ligament Register, the Norwegian Hip Fracture Regis- ter, Centre of excellence of joint replacements. Report June 2010 [ EB/OL],. Http://nrlweb. ihelse, net/eng/Re- port 2010. pdf.
  • 3The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual report 2008 shortened version [ EB/OL]. Http ://www. jru. orthop, gu. se.
  • 4张京航,周立新,田波,等.150例骨科植入物可疑不良事件报告分析[J].中国药物臀戒,2009,6(5):29l-294.
  • 5Clohisy JC, Calvert G, Tull F, et al. Reasons for revision hip surgery.- A retrospective review [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, 429: 188-192.
  • 6Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, et al. Total hip arthroplasties: What are the reasons for revision [ J]. Int Orthop, 2008, 32(5 ) : 597-604.
  • 7庞显伦,梁熙,郭书权,黄伟.48例髋关节置换术后早期失败原因分析[J].西部医学,2011,23(8):1486-1487. 被引量:4
  • 8卢宏章,朱天岳,柴卫兵,文立成,曹永平,李军,刘震宁.髋关节置换术后失败原因分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2008,16(18):1361-1363. 被引量:10
  • 9祝云利,吴海山,符培亮,李晓华,钱齐荣,吴宇黎.髋关节置换术后早期失败原因的回顾性分析[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2009,3(5):13-16. 被引量:14
  • 10Lavernia C J, Alcerro JC. Quality of life and cost-effective- ness 1 year after total hip arthroplasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2010, 26(5) : 705-709.

二级参考文献46

共引文献54

同被引文献107

引证文献9

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部