期刊文献+

中国—东盟自由贸易区国际投资条约的冲突与协调 被引量:1

The Conflict of International Investment Treaties and Its Coordination in CAFTA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在中国—东盟自由贸易区内存在多层级的国际投资条约的适用问题。有的投资条约侧重投资自由化,有的注重对投资的保护,强调投资保护和强调投资自由化之间存在着潜在的冲突。这些条约的缔约国在履行双重条约义务时就难免会发生冲突。就条约具体条款而言,存在实体性规则的冲突和程序性规则的冲突。对于条约冲突的解决可以运用动态的条约解释方法和条约自身的冲突条款予以解决。但条约冲突是一个复杂问题,没有一个简单的方法就可以解决所有冲突,我们只能减少条约的冲突而不能消除所有冲突。 There are application problems of international investment treaties in CAFTA. Some treaties focus on the liberalization, some on protection of investment. There is conflict between them, which leads to the obligation conflict of the contracting states. As to the treaty clauses, there are conflicts of substantive rules and procedural rules. The methods to solve treaty conflicts include dynamic interpretation and conflict clauses of treaties. However, treaty conflict is complicated. There is no single method to solve the conflicts. What we can do is only to minimize but not eliminate all conflicts.
作者 李娟
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《东南亚纵横》 CSSCI 2012年第5期22-25,共4页 Crossroads:Southeast Asian Studies
基金 云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目 项目编号2011Y326
关键词 国际投资条约 冲突 协调 International investment treaties Conflict Coordination
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献31

  • 1余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:39
  • 2徐崇利.国际经济法律冲突与政府间组织的网络化——以世界贸易组织为例的研究[J].西南政法大学学报,2005,7(5):3-13. 被引量:9
  • 3《关于争端解决规则与程序的谅解》第1条和第3条第2款.
  • 41989年《控制危险废物越境转移及其处置的巴塞尔公约》第11条第1款.
  • 5LG&E Energy Corp. et al. v The Republic of Argentina. ICSID ease no. ARB/02/1 (2006) ;Continental Casualty Company v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/O3/gA, award of 5 September 2008.
  • 6See Anthea Roberts, Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, 104 Am. J. Int' l. L. 179 (2010).
  • 7See William W. Burke -White & Andreas yon Stadan, Investment Protection in Extraordinary Time: The Interpretation and Application of Nort - Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties, 48 Va. J. Int' l L. (2008) 307, 376 - 81.
  • 8Id., 320-324,.
  • 9CMS Gas Transmission Company v The Argentine Republic, ICSID case no. ARB/01/08, 12) (annulment proceeding). Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007, para. 128 - 136.
  • 10Sempra Energy International v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/02/16 ( Annulment Proceeding), Decision on the Argentine Re- public' s Request for Annulment of the Award, 29 June 2010.

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部