期刊文献+

我们是我们的行为吗?——理性情绪行为疗法的基本信条之科学方法论考察 被引量:1

Are We What We Do?——On the basic principle of rational emotive behavior therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "他们不是他们的行为"是理性情绪行为疗法理论的一个基本信条。该信条指出,不能从人们所做的行为推出人们所具有的本性,且人们不应当在本性的层面上对自己或他人进行贬低与打击。针对该信条,有的学者论证说:人们当下的行为正体现了人们的本性。从科学方法论角度分析,对"我们就是我们当下的行为"的论证并不能有力地反驳理性情绪行为疗法理论的上述基本信条。该信条可以在一定程度上被合理地理解为:对我们的行为的评价不能等同于对我们的本性的评价。此种理解能够在一定程度上消解对该信条的误读。 "They are not what they do. " is one of the basic principles of rational emotive behavior therapy. It is said that people' s essence or self eouldn' t be inferred from their acts, and human be- ings had better not depreciate or attack themselves and others from such aspect. According to this principle, some scholars argued that : "What I do is me, couldn' t be otherwise. " The paper analyzes the basic principle from the angle of methodology, and maintains that the above argument couldn' t strongly refute the principle; but to a certain extent, this principle could be reasonably interpreted as: ratings of our acts can' t be equal with ratings of our essence. This kind of interpretation could elimi- nate some misreading of the principle.
作者 龚艳
机构地区 南京大学哲学系
出处 《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》 CAS 2012年第6期11-15,共5页 Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基金 江苏省研究生培养创新工程项目(2011-2012)"思想分析技术理论及基础应用研究"(CXZ211_0002)的阶段性成果
关键词 REBT理论 对行为的评价 对本性的评价 过度普遍化 REBT theory ratings of acts ratings of essence grandiose generalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Ellis A. Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy[M].Revised ed.New York:Birch Lane Press,1994.
  • 2Dryden W. Understanding Emotional Problenms:The REBT Perspective[M].New York:Brunner-Routledge,2009.
  • 3McMahon J. Notes on Self and Values in REBT[A].New York:Brunner-Routledge,2003.
  • 4Gorelkin L. Are We Our Acts-Revised:Toward Greater Clarity in The Philosophy and Practice of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy[J].Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy,1997,(01):49-55.doi:10.1023/A:1025002426080.
  • 5Mele A R. The Philosophy of Action[M].New York:Oxford Univeristy Press,1997,(8).doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-09-04800-4.
  • 6Rorer L G. Rational-Emotive Therapy:An Integrated Psychological and Philosophical Basis[J].Cognitive Therapy and Research,1989,(05):475-492.
  • 7Ellis A. A Corrective Note on O' Donohue And Szymansky' s Study of Logical Analysis and REBT' s Use of Empirical Hypothesis Testing As Well As Logical Analysis[J].Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy,1994,(01):73-76.doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0076.
  • 8Waller Sara. How Does Philosophical Counseling Work?Judgment and Interpretation[J].International Journal of Philosophical Practice,2002,(02).
  • 9Milburn M C. Cognitive-Behavior Therapy and Change:Unconditional Self Acceptance and Hypnosis in CBT[J].Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy,2010,(09).doi:10.1086/656489.

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部