期刊文献+

带有转移成本寡头垄断的二次定价及仿真 被引量:4

Strategies in second pricing in oligopolistic competition with switching cost
下载PDF
导出
摘要 寡头垄断企业往往通过二次定价或价格歧视来获取更多的利润,尤其是后入者经常采用先低价抢占市场,再高价获取利润的策略.研究了两个寡头垄断企业二次定价的竞争.证明了定价及总利润与转移成本负相关,第一阶段实行低价策略的寡头企业会在第二阶段定价中失去部分第一阶段获取的超额市场.将第一次定价产生的转移成本看作新产品投放市场广告或市场推广等成本效果,进一步讨论了产品在毗邻位置竞争的情况,指出寡头垄断的利润主要来自转移成本. Oligopolistic enterprises usually price their products for the second time, or use price discrimination, in order to earn more profit, especially for firms who enter the market later on. Most late comers' strategy is to occupy the market share first by pricing lower and then to earn more profit by raising the price. This paper is to study such competition between two oligopolistic enterprises in their second pricing. The study proves that the price and the gross profit are negatively related to the switching cost, and that the oligopoly who practices the lower price strategy at the first pricing stage would lose part of its market share at the second one. By comparing the switching cost, which is generated from the first pricing, with the cost on advertisement or promotion for the new products, the paper discusses the competition among neighboring products and points out that the profit of the oligopoly mainly comes from the switching cost.
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期1-6,共6页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71101107 70772077 70973046) 教育部博士点基金资助项目(20090072120062)
关键词 寡头竞争 转移成本 二次定价 oligarchic competition switching cost second pricing
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1马克?赫斯切.管理经济学[M]北京:机械工业出版社,2005236.
  • 2柯兰德.微观经济学[M]上海:上海人民出版社,2008(3):317.
  • 3黎诣远;李明志.微观经济分析[M]北京:清华大学出版社,2003(pt 7):307.
  • 4Hotelling H. Stability in competition[J].Journal of Economics,1929,(39):41-57.doi:10.2307/2224214.
  • 5Salop S,Stiglitz J. Bargains and Rip-offs.A model of monopolistically competitive price dispersion[J].Review of Economic Studies,1977,(44):493-510.
  • 6顾锋,薛刚,黄培清.存在消费者购买选择的企业定价选址模型[J].系统工程理论方法应用,1999,8(4):32-37. 被引量:29
  • 7d'Aspremont C,Cabszewicz J J,Thisse J F. On Hotelling's stability in competition[J].Econometrica,1979,(17):1145-1151.
  • 8Benassi C,Chirco A,Scrimitore M. Spatial discrimination with quantity competition and high transportation costs:A note[J].Economics Bulletin,2007,(01):1-7.
  • 9赵德余,顾海英,刘晨.双寡头垄断市场的价格竞争与产品差异化策略——一个博弈论模型及其扩展[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(5):1-7. 被引量:40
  • 10Hay D A,Morris D J. Industrial Economics and Organization[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1991.

二级参考文献19

  • 1陈宏民.允许后续企业进入的兼并策略及其福利研究[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(1):17-23. 被引量:5
  • 2唐小我.二度价格歧视情形下垄断厂商收益最大化条件[J].电子科技大学学报,1997,26(2):194-198. 被引量:45
  • 3宋承先,现代西方经济学.微观经济学,1994年
  • 4梁东黎,微观经济学,1991年
  • 5李--,现代西方微观经济学概论,1991年
  • 6Chamberlim E H. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition[ M]. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1933.
  • 7Hay D A, Morris D J. Industrial Economics and Organization[ M] . Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1991.
  • 8Hotelling H. Stability in competition[J]. Journal of Economics, 1929, 39: 41--57.
  • 9Salop S, Stiglitz J. Bargains and rip-offs: A model of monopolistically competitive price dispersion[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1977, (44): 493--510.
  • 10Dixit A, Stiglitz J. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity[J]. American Economic Review, 1977, 67: 297--308.

共引文献111

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部