三种不同静脉行PICC置管的比较

Comparison of three different kinds of intravenous lines in PICC

目的观察三种不同静脉行PICC置管的差别。方法将120例住院患者随机分为A贵要静脉组（n=40例）、B肘正中静脉组（n=40例）、C头静脉组（n=40例），分别观察三组患者穿刺置管1次成功率及留置时间情况。结果三组静脉穿刺置管1次成功率的差异有统计学意义（x2=6．35，P％0．05）；留置时间比较差异有统计学意义（x2=7．56，P〈0．05）k结论经贵要静脉和肘正中静脉穿刺置管成功率及留置时间均显著高于经头静脉穿刺置管。

Objective To observe the difference of three different intravenous lines in PICC. Methods 120 patients were randomly divided into A basilic vein group（ n= 40）, B median cubital vein group（ n= 40 ）, C cephalic vein group （n= 40） ,the three groups were observed in patients with catheterization（1 time） and the success rate of indwelling time. Results The three groups of venipuncture successful rate of the difference was significant（x2=6. 35, P〈 0.05） ;indwelling time difference was significant（x2 =7.56,P〈0.05 ）. Conclusion The basilic vein or median cubital vein puncture success rate and retention time are significantly higher than that of the cephalic vein puncture.