期刊文献+

术前腔内支架与急诊手术治疗左半结肠和直肠癌肠梗阻的安全性与有效性Meta分析 被引量:21

Meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of self-expending metallic stents as bridge to surgery versusemergency surgery for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价术前腔内支架治疗左半结肠和直肠癌肠梗阻的安全性与有效性。方法利用CENTRAL、PubMed、EMBASE、Medline、OvidLww等英文数据库和CMB、CNKI、万方等中文数据库.全面检索术前腔内支架与急诊手术治疗左半结肠和直肠癌肠梗阻的比较研究的中英文随机对照试验和回顾性分析文献.利用RevMan5.1软件对两种治疗方法的安全性和有效性指标进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入14篇文献共1083例患者,其中随机对照研究5篇,回顾性分析9篇。与急诊手术相比,术前腔内支架组围手术期死亡率(RR:O.52;95%CI:0.30-0.93。P〈0.05)和总并发症发生率降低(RR=0.46,95%U:0.31-0.70,P〈0.01),手术切除率提高(RR:1.90,95%U:1.33-2.70,P〈0.01),手术时间(MD=-59.77,95%CI:-87.51-32.04.P〈0.01)和术后排气时间缩短(MD=一10.78,95%CI:-16.67-4.90,P〈0.01):两种方法的永久造瘘率和住院时间的差异则无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。结论术前腔内支架治疗左半结肠和直肠癌肠梗阻的安全性和有效性均优于急诊手术。 Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of self-expending metallic stents (SEMS) as bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for left-sided malignant eolorectal obstruction. Methods A comprehensive literature search of CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Ovid LWW, CMB, CNKI and Wanfang Databases were performed for all randomized controlled trials or retrospective studies comparing self-expending metallic stents as bridge to surgery (SABS group) with emergency surgery (ES group). A meta-analysis was carried out by RevMan5.1 software on the outcomes concerning safety and efficacy of the two groups. Results Fourteen studies matched the criteria including 1083 patients. Five were randomized controlled trials and nine were retrospective analysis. Compared with the ES group, the SABS group had a lower short-term mortality (RR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.30-0.93, P〈0.05), lower overall complications (RR=0.46, 95% CI:0.31-0.70, P〈0.05), higher resection rate (RR=l.90, 95%CI: 1.33-2.70, P〈0.01 ), shorter operative time (MD=-59.77, 95%CI: - 87.51--32.04, P〈0.01), and shorter interval to first flatus (MD=-10.78, 95%CI:-16.67--4.90, P〈 0.01 ). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in permanent stomy and hospital stay. Conclusion The safety and efficacy of self-expending metallic stents as bridge to surgery for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction is suoerior to emergencv surgery.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS 2012年第7期697-701,共5页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 肠梗阻 支架 急诊手术 Meta分析 Colorectal neoplasms Obstruction Stent Emergency surgery Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1汪建平,唐远志,董文广.结直肠癌并急性结肠梗阻的外科处理——附225例临床分析[J].中国胃肠外科杂志,1999,2(2):79-81. 被引量:232
  • 2Leitman IM, Sullivan JD, Brams D, et al. Multivariate analysis of morbidity and mortality from the initial surgical management of obstructing carcinoma of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1992,174(6) :513-518.
  • 3Lau PW, Lo CY, Law WL. The role of one-stage surgery in acute left-sided colonic obstrction. Am J Surg, 1995,169 (4): 406-409.
  • 4Dohmoto M. New method. Endoscopic implantation of rectal stent in palliative treatment of colorectal neoplastic obstructions. Endose Dig, 1991,3 : 1507-1512.
  • 5Martinez-Santos C, Lobato RF, Fradejas JM, et al. Self- expandable stent before elective surgery vs. emergency surgery for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstructions : comparison of primary anastomosis and morbidity rates. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002,45 (3) : 401-406.
  • 6Saida Y, Sumiyama Y, Nagao J, et al. Long-term prognosis of preoperative "bridge to surgery" expandable metallic stent insertion for obstructive colorectal cancer: comparison with emergency operation. Dis Colon Rectum, 2003,46 (10 Suppl) : $44-$g9.
  • 7Ng KC, Law WL, Lee YM, et al. Self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency resection for obstructing left-sided colorectal cancer: a case-matched study. J Gastrointest Surg, 2006,10 (6) : 798-803.
  • 8Baik SH, Kim NK, Cho HW, et al. Clinical outcomes of metallic stent insertion for obstructive colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology, 2006,53 (68) : 183-187.
  • 9Dastur JK, Forshaw M J, Modarai B, et al. Comparison of short-and long-term outcomes following either insertion of self- expanding metallic stents or emergency surgery in malignant large bowel obstruction. Tech Coloproctol, 2008,12( 1 ) :51-55.
  • 10Cheung HY, Chung CC, Tsang WW, et al. Endolaparoscopic approach vs conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg, 2009,144(12) : 1127-1132.

二级参考文献60

共引文献298

同被引文献197

引证文献21

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部