摘要
目的探讨类风湿关节炎(RA)合并间质性肺病(ILD)患者的血清表面活性蛋白A(SP-A)和D(SP-D)水平及临床意义。方法采用双抗体夹心酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)法检测SP-A和SP-D,并比较单纯RA组、RA-ILD组、对照组血清样本SP-A和SP-D水平的差异,分析其与RA合并ILD的相关性。计算3组血清SP-A和SP-D阳性检出率。分析SP—A和SP-D与年龄、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、类风湿因子(RF)、抗环瓜氨酸肽(CCP)抗体、抗核抗体、抗核周因子(APF)和抗角蛋白抗体(AKA)之间的相关性。多组间均数的比较采用方差分析,数据间的相关性分析采用Spearman等级相关。结果①RA—ILD组、单纯RA组、对照组的血清SP-A水平分别为(51.2±9.2)、(25.9±2.6)、(15.4±0.3)μg/L,SP—D水平分别为(42.5±8.1)、(20.8±1.5)、(16.6±0.8)μg/L。RA-ILD组患者血清SP-A和SP-D水平高于单纯RA组以及对照组(P〈0.05)。单纯RA组患者血清SP-A和SP-D水平和健康对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。②RA-ILD组血清SP—A和SP-D的阳性率明显高于单纯RA组(χ^2=5.21,P=0.02;χ^2=4.79,P=0.01)和健康对照组(χ^2=4.96,P=0.03;χ^2=4.75,P=0.02),RA—ILD组血清SP-D的阳性检出率大于血清SP—A(χ^2=4.95,P=0.04)。③RA—ILD患者血清SP-A、SP—D水平与年龄、CRP呈正相关(r=0.687,P=-0.001;r=-0.571,P=-0.009)。④RA—ILD患者血清SP—D水平与RF、抗CCP抗体和AKA呈正相关,而血清SP—A、SP-D水平与抗核抗体、APF、ESR无相关性。结论①SP—A和SP—D可作为RA合并ILD的血清学标志;②SP-A和SP-D在早期诊断RA合并ILD方面有一定价值,SP-D更有效地提示RA合并ILD存在,判断肺损伤程度,预测疾病转归情况。
Objective To measure serum surfactant protein (SP) A and D levels in patients with inter- stitial lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Serum SP-A and SP-D levels of RA, RA-ILD patients and healthy controls were assessed using a sensitive enzyme-linKed immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The relationship between SP-A and SP-D and RA-ILD was analyzed. The serum SP-A and SP-D positive rate was calculated for the three groups. The correlation between SP-A and SP-D with RF, anti-CCP, antinuclear antibody, antikeratin antibody, anti-perinuclear factor, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sediment- ation rate, were analyzed. Mean value of groups were compared with variance analysis, Spearmarn rank correlation test was used for correlation analysis. Results The levels of serum SP-A in RA-ILD patients and RA patients as well as in healthy controls were [ (51.2±9.2), (25.9±2.6), (15.4±0.3) μg/L ] respectively. The level of serum SP-D of the three groups was [ (42.5±8.1), (20.8±1.5), (16.6±0.8) μg/L] respectively. The levels of serum SP-A and SP-D in patients with RA complicated with ILD were higher than those simple RA patients and healthy controls (P〈0.05). The levels of serum SP-A and SP-D in patients with RA were not significaritly higher than those in healthy controls (P〉0.05). The positive rate of serum SP-A and SP-D in RA-ILD patients were significantly higher than those in simple RA patients and healthy controls. The positive rate of serum SP-D of RA-ILD patients was higher than that of SP-A. The levels of serum SP-A and SP-D in patients with RA complicated with ILD were correlated positively with age, C-reactive protein. The level of serum SP-D was correlated positively with RF, anti-CCP, antikeratin antibody. There was no correlation between the level of serum SP-A and SP-D with RA-ILD and antinuclear antibody,antiperinuclear factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Conclusion The levels of serum SP-A and SP-D are correlated with RA-ILD and may be useful markers for ILD in patients with RA. These two paramenters may be helpful to early diagnosis of RA-ILD. The Serum SP-D levels are more sensitive in predicting the development of RA-ILD than other parameters and can help in assessing the severity of lung damage.
出处
《中华风湿病学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第7期463-467,共5页
Chinese Journal of Rheumatology
基金
太原市科技计划专项资助项目(100341)
关键词
关节炎
类风湿
肺疾病
间质性
肺表面活性物质相关蛋白质类
诊断
Arthritis, rheumatoid
Lung disease, interstitial
Pulmonary surfactant-associated proteins
Diagnosis