期刊文献+

基于累积Logit模型的驾驶人路径改换行为影响因素分析 被引量:1

Analysis of the influencing factors of drivers' route-changing behavior based on cumulative Logit model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于调查数据,采用累积Logit模型对影响驾驶人路径改换行为的影响因素进行综合分析,通过理论与实证分析,分析影响路径改换行为的主要因素.首先采用SP调查的方式,用离散选择分析法对影响路径改换的因素进行多变量分析;然后,建立多元累积Logit模型,并利用经济学的基本原理,建立路径改换行为的动态评价模型.分析表明:在拥挤收费的前提下,影响驾驶人路径改换的主要因素,取决于不同的收费额度、驾驶人个体属性(驾车类型、月收入等).这一研究结果可以应用到交通规划与管理过程中. Based on the survey data, a Logit model is used to comprehensively analyse the contributing factors of drivers' route-changing. We hope to explore the main contributing factors of path-changing through theoretical analysis and empirical analysis. First, based on the stated preference survey, we use discrete choice model to analysis multivariable factors which influence the route-changiug behavior. Then the Logit model and the evaluation model of path choice behavior were established by using basic principles of economics. The conclusion shows that drivers probably choose to change the route because of congestion charging. The effect depends on the level of charging bill, the individual attributes of drivers (vehiete type, income, ete). And the conclusion can be applied to some procedures of urban traffic planning and management.
出处 《北京交通大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期69-74,共6页 JOURNAL OF BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2012JBM133)
关键词 交通工程 SP调查 LOGIT模型 路径改换 拥堵收费 traffic engineering stated preference survey Logit model route changing congestion charging
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Conquest L,Spyridakis J,Haselkorn M. The effect of motorist information on commuter behaviour:Classification of drivers into commuter groups[J].Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies,1993,(02):183-201.
  • 2Koutsopouos H N,Lotan T,Yang Q. A driving simulator and its application for modeling route choice in the presence of information[J].Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies,1994,(02):91-107.
  • 3Golledge R G. Geographical perspectives on spatial cognition[J].Behavior and Environment:Psychological and Geographical Approaches,1993.16-46.
  • 4许良,高自友.不确定条件下用户路径选择行为研究述评[J].燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,8(1):139-144. 被引量:11
  • 5陆化普.交通规划理论与方法[M]北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
  • 6张文彤;董伟.SPSS统计分析高级教程[M]北京:高等教育出版社,2004203-207.
  • 7刘宏杰.Logistic回归模型使用注意事项和结果表达[J].中国公共卫生,2001,17(5):466-467. 被引量:23

二级参考文献31

  • 1周国梅,傅小兰.决策的期望效用理论的发展[J].心理科学,2001,24(2):219-220. 被引量:19
  • 2[1]Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998: 232-233.
  • 3[2]Mickey RM, Greenland S. The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol, 1989,129:125-137.
  • 4[1]Avineri E and Prashker J N.Sensitivity to travel time variability:travelers' learning perspective[J].Transportation Research Part C,2005,13 (2):157-183.
  • 5[2]Van Berkum E and Van der Mede P.The impact of traffic infor mation-dynamics in route and departure time choice[M].Delft,Delft University Press,1993.
  • 6[3]Chen A and Recker W.Considering risk taking behavior in travel time reliability[R].Report UCI-ITS-WP-00-24,Institute of Transportation Studies,University of California,Irvine,USA,2000.
  • 7[4]de Palma A and Picard N.Route choice decision under travel time uncertainty[J].Transportation Research Part A,2005,39(4):295-324.
  • 8[5]Bonsall P W.Travelers' response to uncertainty[M] //Bell M G H and Cassir C (Eds.).Reliability of Transport Networks,Research Studies Press Ltd.,UK,2000,1-10.
  • 9[6]Noland R B,Small K A,Koskenoja P M and Chu X H.Simulating travel reliability[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics,1998,28 (5):535-564.
  • 10[7]Noland R B and Polak J.Travel Time variability:a review of theoretical and empirical issues[J].Transport Reviews,2002,22 (1):39-54.

共引文献32

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部