摘要
目的探讨赛霉胺散粉剂外用于患者皮肤溃疡换药的临床治疗效果,并总结护理体会。方法将同期收治的120例体表皮肤溃疡患者随机分为观察组和对照组,观察组64例用赛霉胺散粉剂进行伤口换药,对照组56例用庆大霉素注射液常规伤口换药,结合烤灯照射创面,14d后观察两组创面愈合情况,统计比较疗效。结果观察组用赛霉胺散粉剂总有效率为100%,治愈率为75%;对照组用庆大霉素总有效率为75%,治愈率为50%,治愈率观察组明显高于对照组,P<0.05。结论赛霉胺散粉剂用于体表皮肤溃疡换药疗效优于庆大霉素注射液,且方法简便,易于操作。
Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes for patients with skin ulcer of the external use Sai Mei An Pow- der, and summarize the experience of nursing. Methods One hundred and twenty cases of the skin ulcers admitted to the same period were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The Sai Mei An Powder was used by 64 cas- es of observation group for wound dressing. The Gentamicin injection was used by 56 cases of control group for conven- tional wound dressing. Combined with the heat lamp irradiation wound, observed the wound healing situation of the two sets 14 days later, and compared the efficacy statistics. Results The total effective rate of observation group was 100%, cure rate was 75%. While the total effective rate of control group was 75%, cure rate was 50%. The cure rate of observa- tion group was obviously higher than the control group, P 〈 0.05. Conclusion The Sai Mei An Powder for surface skin ul- cer dressing is more effective than Gentamicin injection, and the method is simple and easy to operate.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2012年第18期119-120,共2页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
皮肤溃疡
赛霉胺散
疗效
护理
Skin ulcer
Sai Mei An Powder
Efficacy
Nursing