摘要
目的:探讨股骨近端髓内钉与可膨胀髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的比较情况。方法:采用回顾性分析的方法,分析我院收治的股骨转子间骨折患者临床资料,依据固定方式不同分为股骨近端髓内钉组30例与可膨胀髓内钉组40例。结果:可膨胀髓内钉组手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、住院时间均低于股骨近端髓内钉组,同时可膨胀髓内钉组股骨转子间骨折疼痛分级也优于股骨近端髓内钉组,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。结论:可膨胀髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折患者创伤小,恢复快。
Objective:To approach Comparative of curing femoral intertrochanteric fracture by proximal femoral nail and expandable intramedullary nail.Methods:To retrospective analysis of clinical data femoral intertrochanteric fracture in our hospital,which was divided into fixed mode proximal femoral nail group 30 cases and expandable intramedullary nail group 40 cases.Results:The operation time,Intraoperative bleeding,length of the incision,hospitalization time of expandable intramedullary nail group were lower than proximal femoral nail group,then pain classification of femoral intertrochanteric fracture of expandable intramedullary nail were better than proximal femoral nail group,P〈0.05,the difference were statistical significance.Conclusion:The small wound,regain quick of femoral intertrochanteric fracture by expandable intramedullary nail,which was to be used.
出处
《中国医药导刊》
2012年第6期994-995,共2页
Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词
股骨近端髓内钉
可膨胀髓内钉
股骨转子间骨折
Proximal femoral nail
Expandable intramedullary nail
Femoral intertrochanteric fracture