期刊文献+

不同剂量舒芬太尼气管插管时对听觉诱发电位指数及血流动力学的影响 被引量:1

Effects of different doses of sufentanil on auditory evoked potential index and hemodynamics during the tracheal intubation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨适合于全麻气管插管时舒芬太尼的剂量。方法入选的90例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级、25~45岁患者,随机分为三组(n=30):舒芬太尼剂量为0.2μg/kg(A组);剂量为0.3μg/kg(B组);剂量为0.35μg/kg(C组),静脉丙泊酚血浆靶浓度为3μg/mL,行OAA/S评分。待OAA/S评分达到3分时给予维库溴胺和舒芬太尼,观察气管插管前后三组的听觉诱发电位指数(AAI)值和血流动力学变化。结果与T0相比,三组在T1、T2时的AAI值均降低(P<0.01),C组在T1、T2时HR值、SpO2值均低于A组和B组(P<0.01),A组在T2时MAP值均高于B组和C组(P<0.01)。结论当异丙酚靶控在3μg/mL,0.3μg/kg剂量的舒芬太尼在全麻气管插管时是安全合适的。 Objective To investigate the appropriate dose of sufentanil in patients during the tracheal incubation. Methods Ninety adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or 11 (ASA I or II ), aged 25-45 years,were included in this study. They were randomly divided into 3 groups,each group had 30 cases,according to the different in duction doses of sufentanil: sufentanil 0.2 μg/kg group (group A), sufentanil 0.3 μg/kg group (group B), sufentanil 0.35 μg/kg group(group C). All patients were induced with TCI of propofol(target plasma concentration set at 3.0 μg/mL). At the time of propofol achieving the target plasma concentration of 3.0 μg/mL,Observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) was measured. When OAA/S reached 3 scores,vecuronium and sufentanil were administrated with IV of 0.2,0.3,0.35 μg/kg. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR),oxygen saturation of pulse oximeter (SpO2) and auditory evoked potential index(AAI) were recorded at immediately after injection of sufentanil(T0), pre traceal intubation(T1), endotracheal intuba- tion(T2) using Intellivue MP50 monitor and EEG monitoring device. Results The valus of AAI at T1 ,T2 were significantly lower than that at To in three groups. The valus of HR,SpO2 at TI ,T2 in group C were significantly lower than those in group B and group A (P 〈 0.01 ) ;The valus of MAP at T2 in group A were significantly increased than those in group B and group C(P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Sufentanil 0.3 μg/kg(group B) is the suitable dose of choice during the tracheal in- cubation when combined with propofol TCI with Cp set at 3.0 μg/mL in patients and hemodynamics is stable.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2012年第16期102-104,共3页 China Modern Doctor
基金 浙江省医学会临床科研基金项目(2011ZYC-A112)
关键词 舒芬太尼 异丙酚 脑电描记术 药物释放系统 清醒镇静 Sufentanil Propofol Ectroencephalograph Drug delivcry systems Conscious sedation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Capogna G, Gamorcia M ,Columb MO. Minimum analgesic doses of fen- tanyl and sufentanil for epidural analqesia in the first stage of labor[J]. Anesth Anulg,2003,96(4) : 1178-1182.
  • 2舒芬太尼多中心研讨会纪要[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2004,20(11):668-668. 被引量:48
  • 3Pollock JE, Neal JM, Liu SS, et al. Sedation during Spinal Anesthesia[J]. Anesthesiology, 2000,93 (3) : 728-734.
  • 4Mantzaridis H,Kenny GN. Auditory evoked potential index: a quantita- tive measure of changes in auditory evoked potentials during general anaesthesia[J]. Anaesthesia, 1997,52( 11 ) : 1030-1036. . 2_.
  • 5Guignard B,Menigaux C,Dupont X,et al. The effect of remifentanil on the bispectral index change and hemodynamic responses after orotra- cheal intubation[J]. Anesth Analg, 2000,90 : 161-167.
  • 6葛圣金,庄心良,薛张纲,方芳.肌松状态下听觉诱发电位指数监测觉醒状态恢复与消失[J].复旦学报(医学版),2006,33(4):505-508. 被引量:3
  • 7Ge SJ,Zhuang XL,Wang YT,et al. Performance of the rapidly extracted auditory evoked potentials index to detect the recovery and loss of wake- fulness in anesthetized and paralyzed patients[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2003,47 ( 4 ) : 466-.471.
  • 8苏依丹,何日辉,李士通,赵凯,葛圣金,张曦,庄心良.听觉诱发电位指数及脑电双频谱指数与芬太尼复合异丙酚镇静深度的相关性[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(10):926-928. 被引量:7
  • 9米卫东,刘靖,曹江北,张宏.脑电双频指数与听觉诱发电位指数监测诱导期麻醉深度的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2004,20(9):515-517. 被引量:24
  • 10Conti G,Arangeli A,Antonelli M,et al. Sedation with sufentanil in patients receiving pressure support ventilation has no effects on respi- ration :a pilot study[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2004,51:494-499.

二级参考文献49

  • 1舒芬太尼多中心研讨会纪要[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2004,20(11):668-668. 被引量:48
  • 2史春霞,李立环,卿恩明,姜贞,李士通,姚尚龙,郭曲练,王文贤,熊利泽,张铁铮,齐娟,付志俭.舒芬太尼麻醉用于心血管手术的多中心临床研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(8):519-521. 被引量:114
  • 3Litvan H,Jensen EW,Revuelta M,et al. Comparison of auditory evoked potentials and the A-line ARX Index for monitoring the hypnotic level during sevoflurane and propofol induction. Acta anaesthesiol Scand, 2002, 46:245.
  • 4Jensen EW,Nygaard M,Henneberg SW. On-line analysis of middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP)for monitoring depth of anaesthesia in laboratory rats.Med Eng Phys, 1998,20:722.
  • 5Mantzaridis H,Kenny GN. Auditory evoked potential index: a quantitative measure of changes in auditory evoked potentials during general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 1997,52 : 1030.
  • 6Gajraj RJ,Doi M,Mantzaridis H, et al. Analysis of the EEG bispectrum, auditory evoked potentials and the EEG power spectrum during repeated transitions from consciousness to unconsciousness. Br J Anaesth, 1998,80: 46.
  • 7Iselin-Chaves IA,Moalem HE EI,Gan TJ, et al. Changes in the auditory evoked potentials and the bispectral index following propofol or propofol and alfentanil. Anesthesiology, 2000,92:1300.
  • 8Bailey PL,Egan TD,Stanley TH. Intravenous opioid anesthetics. In Miller RD, eds. Anesthesia, 5th ed. Philadelphia : Churchill Livingstone, 2000. 274.
  • 9Absalom AR,Sutcliffe N,Kenny GN. Effects of the auditory stimuli of an auditory potential system on level of consciousness, and on the bispectral index. Br J Anaesth,2001,87: 778.
  • 10Murkin JM.Sufentanil anesthesia for major surgery:the multi centre Canadian clinical trial.Can J Anaesth,1989,36:343-349.

共引文献121

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部