期刊文献+

痔上黏膜环切术治疗脱垂性痔病的临床研究 被引量:6

Clinical Research of TST in the Treatment of Prolapsed Hemorrhoids
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨痔上黏膜环切术(TST)与传统外剥内扎手术方法治疗环状混合痔的临床效果。方法:选取2010年6月至2011年6月期间在我院住院治疗的环状混合痔患者80例。随机分为试验组(TST)和对照组(外剥内扎),观察两组患者术中、术后一般情况及并发症的发生情况。结果:试验组手术时间、术中出血量均明显少于对照组,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组住院时间明显短于对照组,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组术后疼痛指数、尿潴留、肛门肿胀及便血率明显少于对照组,两者比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:TST治疗脱垂性痔病较传统外剥内扎术式有显著优点。 Objective:To study the clinical effect of TST and traditional external dissection and internal ligation in the treatment of circularity mixed hemorrhoid.Methods:80 patients with circularity mixed hemorrhoid during the June 2010 to June 2011 in our hospital were randomly divided into treatment group(TST) and the control group(external dissection and internal ligation).Observe the general situation and complications of the two groups during the intraoperative and afteroperation.Results:The operation time and perioperative bleeding of treatment group were significantly less than the control group.The length of stay in the treatment group is significantly shorter(P〈0.05).The pain index,urinary retention,anus swelling and hematochezia birth rate in treatment group are less than that of the control group(P〈0.05).The operation effective power and total cost in treatment group has no statistically significant compared the control group(P〈0.05).Conclusion:TST treatment has a significant advantage and worth of clinic application compared the traditional method.
出处 《中医学报》 CAS 2012年第7期810-811,共2页 Acta Chinese Medicine
基金 上海市卫生局青年基金(编号:490)
关键词 痔上黏膜环切术 脱垂性痔病 外剥内扎术 TST prolapsed hemorrhoids external dissection and internal ligation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献6

共引文献2176

同被引文献32

  • 1痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2119
  • 2国家中医药管理局.中医肛肠科病证诊断疗效标准[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1996:33.
  • 3Ross NP, Hildebrand DR, Tiernan JP, et al. Haemorrhoids :21 st-centu- ry management [ J ]. Colorectal Dis,2012,14 ( 8 ) :917 - 919.
  • 4Denoya PI, Fakhoury M, Chang K, et al. Dearterialization with muco- pexy versus haemorrhoidectomy for grade II1 or IV haemorrhoids: short-term results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial [ J ]. Colorectal Dis ,2013,15 (10) : 1281 - 1288.
  • 5Giuratrabocchetta S,Pecorella G, Stazi A,et at. Safety and short-tema effectiveness of EEA stapler vs PPH stapler in the treatment of degree III haemorrhoids : prospective randomized controlled trial [ J 1. Coloree- tal Dis,2013,15(3) :354 -358.
  • 6Bharati H, Sandeep G. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for haemorrhoids:a review of our early experience[ J ]. Indian J Surg,2012,74 ( 2 ) : 163 - 165.
  • 7Lin HC, Luo HX,Zbar AP, et al. The tissue selecting technique (TST) versus the Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for prolap- sing hemorrhoids : a retrospective case-control Study [ J ]. Tech Coloprocto1,2014,18 ( 8 ) :739 - 744.
  • 8吴莉娟,贺平.痔手术治疗研究进展[C]//第十五届中国中西医结合大肠肛门病学术交流会议,济南,2012:478-480.
  • 9Lin HC, Ren DL, He QL, et al. Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III-IV prolapsing hemorrhoids : a two - year prospective controlled Study [ J ]. Tech Coloprocto1,2012,16 (5) :337 - 343.
  • 10Lin HC, He QL, Ren DL, et al. Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy : a minimally invasive technique for hemorrhoids [ J ]. Surg Today, 2012,42 (9) : 868 - 875.

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部