期刊文献+

语义Web中对象共指的消解研究 被引量:7

Research on Resolving Object Coreference on the Semantic Web
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着语义Web的快速发展,语义Web数据大幅增长.在语义Web中,单个对象很可能由多个不同的标识符(例如URI)指称.语义Web中,对象共指的消解是识别语义Web中指称相同对象的不同标识符,并消除描述这些标识符的RDF(resource description framework)数据之间不一致性的过程,它对于语义Web数据的融合、搜索、浏览等具有重要作用.首先,形式化定义了语义Web中对象共指的消解问题;然后,从对象共指识别使用的特征、数据冲突的消解方式、对象共指消解方法的适用范围、现有原型系统和基准测试集这5个方面调研了最新的研究进展;最后,讨论了尚存的挑战,并展望未来可能的研究发展方向. Semantic Web data proliferates with the rapid growth of the semantic Web. An object on the semantic Web is likely to be denoted with many identifiers (e.g., URIs) by different parties. Resolving an object coreference on the semantic Web is to identify different identifiers for the same object and eliminate the inconsistency between their involved RDF (resource description framework) data, which is important for semantic Web data fusion, search, browsing, etc. In this paper, the problem of resolving object coreference on the semantic Web is first formalized. Next, the state of the art of works are surveyed and categorized into five aspects: The used characteristics for coreference identification, the mechanisms for data conflict resolution, the applicable scopes of current approaches, prototypes, and benchmarks. Finally, open research issues are discussed and possible future research directions are also pointed out.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期1729-1744,共16页 Journal of Software
基金 国家自然科学基金(61003018 61100040 61021062) 国家社会科学基金(11AZD121) 国家教育部博士点基金(20100091120041) 江苏省自然科学基金(BK2011189)
关键词 对象共指 共指消解 实例匹配 语义WEB 数据融合 object coreference coreference resolution instance matching semantic Web data fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献185

共引文献223

同被引文献38

  • 1张维一,陆汝占.本体模块化的研究与实现[J].计算机应用研究,2007,24(11):206-209. 被引量:12
  • 2Doran P, Tamma V, Iannone L. Ontology module ex- http ://journal. seu. edu. cn.
  • 3Euzenat J, Meilicke C, Stuckenschmidt H, et al. On- tology alignment evaluation initiative : six years of expe- rience[ J ]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2011, 6720 : 158 - 192.
  • 4Cheatham M, Hitzler P. String similarity metrics for ontology alignment [ C ]//Proceedings of the Interna- tional Semantic Web Conference 2013. Sydney, Aus- tralia, 2013 : 294 -309.
  • 5Udrea O, Getoor L, Miller R J. Leveraging data and structure in ontology integration [ C ]//Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Man- agement of Data. Beijing, China, 2007 : 449 - 460.
  • 6Grau B C, Horrocks I, Kazakov Y, et al. Modular reuse of ontologies : theory and practice [ J ]. Journal of Artifi- cial Intelligence Research, 2008, 31( 1 ) : 273 - 318.
  • 7Ghafourian S, Rezaeian A, Naghibzadeh M. Graph- based partitioning of ontology with semantic similarity [ C ]//Proceedings of International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering. Mashhad, Iran, 2013: 80-85.
  • 8Santipantakis G, Vouros G A. Modularizing ontologies for the construction of E-SHIQ distributed knowledge bases [ C ]//Proceedings of 8th Hellenic Conference on AI. Ioannina, Greece, 2014:192-206.
  • 9Newman M E J. Fast algorithm for detecting commu- nity structure in networks [ J ]. Physical Review E, 2004, 69(6): 066133-01-066133-05.
  • 10Cheng G, Ge W, Qu Y. Falcons: searching and browsing entities on the semantic web [ C ]//Proceed- ings of the International World Wide Web Conference 2008. Beijing, China, 2008 : 1101 - 1102.

引证文献7

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部