期刊文献+

不要把公民权利关在学校门外——美国中小学学生权利研究 被引量:2

Do Not Shed the Constitutional Rights at the Schoolhouse Gate:Study on the Rights of American K-12 Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 合理而清晰地界定中小学学生权利,是解决教育系统中学生发展和教育权威顾此失彼的两难问题的关键。美国于20世纪60至70年代在保障学生权利方面取得重大进步,并逐渐形成成熟体系。美国中小学学生权利包括:受教育和学习的权利、自由表达的权利、平等权、人身安全及隐私权。学生权利的界限处于不断变动之中,20世纪90年代以来,其总的变化趋势是学生的言论自由权受到更严格的限制,而受教育权、隐私权和平等权则受到更多保障。 To reasonably and clearly define the rights of students is the key to strike a better balance between students" autonomy of individual development and the imposing of educational authority. America has made great improvements in protecting the fights of k-12 students in 1960s and 1970s and has formed a sound system. The rights of k-12 students mainly consist of the fights to education and learning, fights to free expression, right to equality, and fights to security and privacy. The boundaries of the rights of students are changing. Since the 1990s, the overall trend is that the student's fight to freedom of expression is seriously restricted, and the fights to education, privacy and equality are getting more protection.
作者 程红艳
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第12期79-84,共6页 Research in Educational Development
基金 全国教育科学规划国家一般项目"重构学校制度生活培育现代公民精神研究"(BEA110033)的部分研究成果
关键词 中小学 公民权利 学生权利 言论自由 k-12 school, civil fights, rights of students, freedom of expression
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1王辉.我国中小学教师无度惩戒现象的分析[J].教育理论与实践,2001,21(10):27-30. 被引量:26
  • 2侯书栋,吴克禄.高校学生管理中的正当程序[J].高等教育研究,2004,25(5):90-94. 被引量:31
  • 3陈玉琨,戚业国.论我国高校内部管理的权力机制[J].高等教育研究,1999,20(3):38-41. 被引量:112
  • 4United States Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, History: Twenty-Five Years of Progress in Educating Children With Disabilities Through IDEA[EB/OL]. http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/leg/idea/history.pdf.
  • 5Timothy W. v. Rochester School District,1989[EB/OL].http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/875/954/179023/.
  • 6Price, Janet R, Levine,Alan H, Cary, Eve.The Rights of Students[M]. Southern Illinois University Press, 1988.48,56.
  • 7Susan Epperson v. Arkansas,Supreme Court of the United States,1968.[EB/OL]http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/Epperso.htm.
  • 8Price, Janet R. Levine,Alan H. Cary, Eve.The Rights of Students [M]. Southern Illinois University Press, 1988.25,13,39- 40,129,126,136-139.
  • 9Gane, Christopher; Mackarel, Mark.Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors and Lawyers[M].Kluwer Law International press,1997.652.
  • 10秦梦群,美国教育法与判例[M].台北:高等教育文化事业有限公司出版,2004.368,315.

二级参考文献29

共引文献168

同被引文献13

  • 1侯健.言论自由及其限度[J].北大法律评论,2000,1(2):62-127. 被引量:93
  • 2丹尼尔.西蒙斯.对言论自由的可允许限制[J].国际新闻界,2005,27(4):9-11. 被引量:28
  • 3李炳烁.言论自由的限度理论[J].江苏大学学报(社会科学版),2005,7(5):33-37. 被引量:11
  • 4余雅风.契约行政:促进高等学校学生管理的法治化[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007(2):17-23. 被引量:17
  • 5密尔著,论自由,许宝暌译[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007:4.
  • 6Curtis G. Bentley, Student Speech in Public Schools: A Comprehensive Approach Framework Based on the Role of Public Schools in Democratic Education[J].B.Y.U. Educational And Law Journal, 2009, (1).
  • 7Leading Cases.Freedom of Expression and Speech[J]. Harvard Law Review, 2007, (1).
  • 8SuSan Balter-Reitz. Lock Down behind the Schoolhouse Gate: Student Speech from Tinker to Morse[C]. Free Speech Yearbook 44, 2009.
  • 9Dan V. Kozlowski. Toothless Tinker: The Continued Erosion of Student Speech Rights[J]. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2011, (88).
  • 10Brenden Dougherty.Poisning the Learning Environment:Creating More Space for Student Speech[D]. Boston College, 2010.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部