差异与互补——建筑现象学与空间句法的对话

Differences and Complements:Dialogue Between Architectural Phenomenology and Space Syntax

针对建筑现象学与空间句法在研究视角及内容上相关性,并结合国内较少关联两个理论的现状,该文从认知的主客体统一问题、描述的语言问题、个关于"辐射"形构图,早在我国原始社会体体验与整体规则、视觉体验与综合体验这四个话题入手,分析比较了建筑现象学与空间句法理论的异同。指出存在于上述四个话题中的根本差异仍在于主体依据考古学家对六千年前的陕西西安半坡仰韶描述空间的语言不同,现象学是基于个体的直觉体验,而空间句法是基于整体的视知觉科学模拟。如果能将两种理论的差异性语言进行互补与转达,那么,就建筑群已经采取了一种‘向心’(面向着一个有可能在两个理论间搭建科学性与体验性的统合方法。

Focusing on the correlations of study field and content between architectural phenomenology and space syntax, this article presents some differences and similarities within the dialogue between these two theories through elaborating the four topics： reunifying cognitive subject and object, describing cognitive method, individual experience and overall science law, visual experience and comprehensive experience. The essential difference within above four topics is different linguistic description when scholar represents spatial experience. Phenomenology bases on individual intuition experience, while space syntax bases on overall scientific rule which depends on visual simulation of perception science. Therefore, an integrated methodology which links architectural phenomenology and space syntax together may be restored if we translate or complement this difference within the two theories.