摘要
国内学者一般将发展主义划为三类:拉美型发展主义,东亚型发展主义和西方型发展主义。发展主义自身固有的生成背景和否定意涵使学界普遍持一种反思的态度,目前对发展主义的批判包括哲学反思、生态反思和新发展主义三个层面。摆脱"就事论事式"和"全盘西化式"的研究态度和水准,进而转入"形而上学式"和"自主创新式"的理论探索,这是国内的发展研究需要进一步着力的方向,包括三个方面:将发展主义历史化,积极寻求另类的发展和构建新的发展价值体系。
Domestic scholars normally classify developmentalism into three categories, that they are Latin American developmentalism, East Asian developmentalism and Western developmentalism respectively. The inherent generating back-ground and the hegemony of developmentalism itself create a widespread reflection attitude among scholars. The current reflection is focused on three perspectives including philology, ecology and neo-developmentalism. Getting rid of " consider something as it stands" and "wholesale westernization" research manner and level, and then turning to "metaphysics" and "independent innovation" theoretical exploration, should be the direction that the domestic development study needs to further focus on. This direction is combined by realizing historical developmentalism, seeking the alternative development and constructing new development value system.
出处
《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2012年第2期57-65,共9页
Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
基金
中国农业大学科研创新专项(编号KYCX2011104)的支持
关键词
发展主义
发展研究
另类发展
解构
后现代
Developmentalism
Development studies
Alternative development
Deconstruction
Postmodern