期刊文献+

口语评分中评分员对评分标准的理解和使用——配对口试评分的报告分析

Raters' Understanding and Utilization of the Rating Scale in an Oral Test:An Analysis of Scoring Process in a Paired Candidate Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过有声思维实验方法并辅以刺激回忆,收集四名不同性格倾向的评分员在配对口语考试评分时进行的思维报告数据,定性分析结果表明:在实际评分中,评分员对评分量表的理解和使用存在很大的差异性,具体表现在:(1)外向的评分员在评分过程中,表现的比内向的评分员更为宽容;(2)内向的评分员更多地关注评分量表中的各项具体指标和标准,而外向的评分员强调任务的完成状况和考生之间的比较、交流,和互动;(3)外向的评分员比内向的评分员更少地依赖评分量表,更多地使用非语言的特征。本研究结果对考试评分标准的修订和评分员培训均有启示。 This study adopted Think Aloud Protocol and stimulated recall to collect thinking data of four raters with different personality types. Qualitative researches demonstrate that raters have distinct understanding and utilization of rating scales. The more detailed findings are: (1)the introverted raters are more severe than extroverted ones; (2)the introverted raters pay more attention to the specific features of the rating scale, whereas extroverted raters concentrate task realization and the interaction of candidates ; (3)the extroverted raters attend to more non - criterion features, and rely much less on the rating scale. These findings have implications for both the development of rating scales and the training of raters for paired candidate discussion tasks.
出处 《鸡西大学学报(综合版)》 2012年第6期33-34,44,共3页 JOurnal of Jixi University:comprehensive Edition
基金 2010年福建工程学院教育科学规划课题(批准号:GB-K-10-18)项目成果 重大专项子课题 课题编号:GA-K-09-06
关键词 配对口语评分 评分标准 口试评分 paired oral scoring rating criteria oral scoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Berry, V. A study of the interaction between indi- vidual personality differences and oral performance test fac- ets. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. King' s College, U- niversity of London. 2004 ( 1 ) :25.
  • 2Ockey, G. J. Is the oral interview superior to thegroup oral? [J]. Working Papers on Language Acquisition and Education, International University of Japan, 2009 (4), 165 - 167.
  • 3Iwashita, N. The validity of the paired interview in oral performance assessment [ J ]. Melbourne Papers in Lan- guage Testing, 1998 (5) : 51 - 65.
  • 4Orr, M. The FCE Speaking test : using rater reports to help interpret test scores [ J ]. System, 2002 (30) : 143 - 154.
  • 5May, L. Assessment:of oral proficiency in EAP programs: A case for pair interaction [ J ]. Language and Communication Review, 2009(9) :13 - 19.
  • 6盛越,管博.配对形式在口语考试中的作用--从剑桥第一证书口试看配对形式的作用Journal of Lanzhou Railway University[J].兰州铁道学院学报(社科版),2000(5).
  • 7邹申.试论口语测试的真实性[J].外语界,2001(3):74-78. 被引量:80
  • 8熊敦礼,陈玉红,刘泽华,黄更新.大学英语大规模录音口语测试研究[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(4):283-287. 被引量:54
  • 9Skehan, P: A cognitive approach to language learning[ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press. 1998 : 172.

二级参考文献4

  • 1Alderson, J., C. Clapham & D. Wall. 2000. Language Test Construction and Evaluation [M]. Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press and Cambridge University Press.
  • 2Heaton, J. B. 1988. Writing English Language Tests [M]. New York: Longman Group UK Limited.
  • 3Underhill, N. 1989. Testing Spoken Language: A Handbook of Oral Testing Techniques [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 4黄素华,1998,科学公正地测试学生的口语能力[A],载邹申编<英语语言测试>[C].上海:上海外语教育出版社.

共引文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部