期刊文献+

牛O型、亚洲Ⅰ型口蹄疫疫苗不同免疫次数免疫后群体抗体合格率比较 被引量:3

Comparison of FMD Type O-Asia Ⅰantibody groups qualified rate in cattle after different immunization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究选取沈阳地区饲养管理正规的牛规模场,采用液相阻断ELISA试验方法测定牛血清样品中O型-亚洲Ⅰ型口蹄疫抗体水平,并计算免疫抗体的群体合格率。用O型-亚洲Ⅰ型二价苗一免、二免、三免的牛在免后28d时牛O型-亚洲Ⅰ型口蹄疫免疫抗体群体合格率研究结果表明,O型口蹄疫免疫抗体群体合格率分别为82.5%、100%、100%;亚洲Ⅰ型口蹄疫免疫抗体群体合格率分别为57.5%、97.5%、97.5%。一免后O型和亚洲Ⅰ型口蹄疫免疫抗体群体合格率下降速度均较快,一免后60dO型免疫抗体群体合格率降到72.5%,免后80d时O型、亚洲Ⅰ型口蹄疫免疫抗体群体合格率分别降为47.5%、12.5%。二免以上的牛口蹄免疫抗体群体合格率在28~120d内均较一免组高,而且抗体持续时间也长,三免后120d时O型、亚洲Ⅰ型口蹄疫免疫抗体群体合格率仍高达77.5%、75%。 In this study, large amount breading field of cattle were chosen to investigate the deamplification rule of type O and type O-Asia I. Liquid phase block ELISA was used to determine the type O-Asia maternal antibody in Cattle and to calculate the group qualified rate.The group qualified rate at day 28 after first, second and third immunization with FMD type O and type O-Asia I combined vaccine are 82.5%, 97.5% and 97.5%.The group qualified rate droped sharply after the first immunization. The type O antibody group qualified rate droped to 72.5% after first immunization at day 60. The type O and type O-Asia I droped to 47.5% and 12.5% after first immunization at day 80. Cattle which injceted the vaccine twice presented a higher group qualified rate than the group which just injected once during day 28 to 120, and the antibody lasted longer. After the third immunization the type O and type O-Asia I group qualified rate remain 77.5% and 75% on day 120.
作者 依颖新
出处 《现代畜牧兽医》 2012年第6期43-46,共4页 Modern Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine
关键词 口蹄疫 免疫次数 免疫抗体 群体合格率 FMD injection times Immune Antibody Group Qualified rate Cattle
  • 相关文献

同被引文献26

  • 1靳兴军,韩磊,王玉田,冯小宇,纪蔚红,张跃,王滨,白如念.牛亚洲Ⅰ型口蹄疫免疫程序试验[J].中国兽医杂志,2006,42(8):15-16. 被引量:2
  • 2FARSANG A, FRENTZEL H, KULCSR G, et al. Control of the de- liberate spread of foot -and -mouth disease virus [ J ]. Biosecur Bio- terror, 2013,11 (Suppl 1 ) :Sl15 - 122.
  • 3KNIGHT - JONES T J, RUSHTON J. The economic impacts of foot and mouth disease - what are they, how big are they and where do they occur[ J ]. Prey Vet Med,2013,112 (3/4) : 161 - 173.
  • 4RWEYEMAMU M, ROEDER P, MACKAY D, et al. Epidemiological patterns of foot - and - mouth disease worldwide [ J ]. Transbound Emerg Dis, 2008,55 ( 1 ) :57 -72.
  • 5YAMAZAKI W,MIOULET V,MURRAY L, et al. Development and evaluation of multiplex RT - LAMP assays for rapid and sensitive de- tection of Foot - and - mouth disease virus [ J ]. J Virol Methods, 2013,192 (1/2) : 18 - 24.
  • 6CHEN H T, PENG Y H, ZHANG Y G,et al. Detection of Foot - and - mouth disease serotype O by ELISA using a monoclonal anti- body [ J ]. Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother, 2013,32 ( 1 ) : 47 - 49.
  • 7QUATI'ROCCHI V, MOLINARI P, LANGELLOTFI C, et al. Co - inoculation of baculovirus and FMDV vaccine in mice, elicits very early protection against Foot and mouth disease virus without inter-feting with long lasting immunity [ J]. Vaccine, 2013,31 ( 24 ) : 2713 -2718.
  • 8LUDI A, RODRGUEZ L. Novel approaches to Foot - and - mouth disease vaccine development [ J ]. Dev Biol ( Basel ), 2013,135 : 107 - 116.
  • 9任林柱,王兴龙,王学理,张辉,刘锴.抗口蹄疫病毒策略研究进展[J].中国畜牧兽医,2008,35(2):111-114. 被引量:6
  • 10于永志.牛O型、亚洲I型口蹄疫不同免疫程序免疫抗体效价对比试验[J].农业科技与信息,2008(17):48-49. 被引量:3

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部