期刊文献+

基于三级信息融合结构的多平台多雷达目标识别算法 被引量:11

An Effective Multi-Platform Multi-Radar Target Identification Algorithm Based on Three Level Fusion Hierarchical Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解决多平台多雷达目标识别时空信息融合过程中存在的时效性不高,识别特征信息模糊和雷达识别结果高冲突等问题,提出了一种基于三级信息融合结构的多平台多雷达目标识别算法。一级特征融合中,基于模糊评判法解决了多特征识别信息模糊问题。二级空域融合中,基于DS融合规则和折扣融合规则,提出了以平均证据距离为阈值的自适应证据融合算法。三级时域融合基于多雷达序列信息,给出了时域自适应融合算法。仿真计算结果表明文中提出的融合结构能够在保证结果正确的同时,每个周期都能输出结果,时效性较之以往的融合结构有了明显改善。文中的自适应证据融合算法能够克服证据间可能存在的高冲突性,并且与采用折扣证据融合算法相比计算量显著减少。 There are some factors that influence the multi-radar target identification time-space information fusion: the low timeliness, the high conflicts among identification results of sensors, and the fuzziness and the uncertainties of identification features. Sections 1 and 2 of the full paper explain the algorithm mentioned in the tide, which we believe is effective and its core consists of: " Section 1 designs three level fusion hierarchical structure for multi- platform multi-radar target identification. Subsection 1.1 uses the fuzzy synthetic evaluation to describe the fuzzi- ness and uncertainties of identification features to get the identification results of single radar. Subsection 1.2 de- signs the algorithm that adaptively chooses evidence fusion rules for spatial information fusion, according to the threshold of the average evidence distance. Subsection 1.3 proposes the adaptive time evidence fusion algorithm, based on sequence information of multi-radar. Subsection 2. 1 explains simulation calculations. " Simulation re- sults, presented in Tables 2 through 5, and their analysis show preliminarily that: (1) our fusion hierarchical structure can indeed get the right output result for each period, and its timeliness is better than that of Ref. 3 by Hong and Lynch; (2) Tables 2 and 3 show that our adaptive evidence fusion algorithm, compared with DS fusion rules and discount evidence fusion rules, can indeed not only solve the problem of the high conflicts among identifi- cation results of sensors but also reduce the computational complexity.
出处 《西北工业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期367-372,共6页 Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University
基金 航空科学基金(20100853010)资助
关键词 自适应证据融合算法 模糊综合评判 目标识别 三级信息融合结构 algorithms, calculations, computational complexity,formation fusion, radar, schematic diagrams, spacenalysis adaptive evidence fusion algorithm, fuzzylevel fusion hierarchical structure efficiency, identification (control systems), in-time adaptive processing, targets, time domain a-synthetic evaluation, target identification, three
分类号 E917 [军事]
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1王晓博,阎红星,王国宏,关成斌.一种基于u检验的空海目标分类方法[J].海军航空工程学院学报,2007,22(4):426-430. 被引量:5
  • 2李剑峰,乐光新,尚勇.基于改进型D—S证据理论的决策层融合滤波算法[J].电子学报,2004,32(7):1160-1164. 被引量:23
  • 3叶清,吴晓平,宋业新.基于权重系数与冲突概率重新分配的证据合成方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2006,28(7):1014-1016. 被引量:32
  • 4Jousselme A I., Grenier D, Bosse E. A New Distance Between Two Bodies of Evidence[J]. Information Fusion, 2001(2) :91- 101.
  • 5Sharer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence[M]. Princeton U. P. : Princeton, N.J. ,1976.
  • 6Yager R R. On the Dempster Sharer Framework and New Combination Rules[J]. Information System, 1989, 41 (2) : 93-137.
  • 7Smarandache F,Dezert J. Proportional Conflict Redistribution Rules for Information Fusion[M]. In F. Smarandache and J. Dezert, Editors, Applications and Advances of {DSmT for Information Fusion} .2006 , Volume 2, Chapter 1 : 3 -68. American Research Press Rehoboth.
  • 8Murphy C K. Combining Belief Functions When Evidence Conflicts[J].Decision Support Systems, 2000(29) : 1-9.
  • 9Deng Yong, Shi Wen Kang, Zhu Zhen Fu, Liu Qic, Combining Belief Functions Based on Distance of Evidence[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2004(38):489-493.
  • 10Adam Caromicoli, Thomas Kurien. Multitarget identification in airborne surveillance[C]// SHE, Aerospace Pattern Recognition, Vol. 1098, 1989:161-176.

共引文献57

同被引文献62

  • 1潘泉,于昕,程咏梅,张洪才.信息融合理论的基本方法与进展[J].自动化学报,2003,29(4):599-615. 被引量:181
  • 2刘永祥,朱玉鹏,黎湘,庄钊文.导弹防御系统中的目标综合识别模型[J].电子与信息学报,2006,28(4):638-642. 被引量:16
  • 3何彦峰.浅析临近空间平台的军事应用[J].国防科技,2007,28(6):32-35. 被引量:29
  • 4张所地,王拉娣.DEMPTER-SHAFER合成法则的悖论[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,17(5):82-85. 被引量:16
  • 5洪延姬,金星,李小将,等.临近空间飞行器技术[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2012:179-184.
  • 6Dempster A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping [J]. Annals of Mathematical Sta- tistics, 1967, 38(2): 325-339.
  • 7Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence[R]. US: Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 8Haenni R. Are alternatives to Dempster's rule of combi- nation real alternative Comments on "about the belief function combination and the conflict management prob- lem"[J]. Information Fusion, 2002,3 (4) : 237-239.
  • 9Murphy C K. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000, 29 (1) : 1-9.
  • 10权文.基于D-S证据理论的目标识别技术研究[D].西安:空军工程大学,2012.

引证文献11

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部