摘要
目的:对目前实验室常用的4种miRNA提取方法的比较,探讨其临床实用性。方法:使用各自的说明书进行提取miRNA,检测目前血液中公认含量比较高的miRNA--U6,通过RT和Q-PCR后的CT值,进行含量和稳定性比较。结果:miRNeasy Mini Kit-TRIzol的CT值较小,稳定性也较好。结论:各种提取方法有显著差异,但是差异较小,miRNeasy Mini KitTRIzol法相对而言较好。
Objective:Comparison of current laboratory used four kinds of miRNA extraction, to explore its clinical utility. Methods: Respective manual extraction of miRNA to detect the relatively high content of blood recognized the miRNA - U6 RT and Q-PCR CT value, content and stability. Resuhs:CT value of miRNeasy Mini KitTRIzol is the best, mirVana PARIS kit have a good stability. Conclusion:Significant differences in the various extraction methods, but the difference is smaller,and the miRNeasy Mini KitTRIzol relatively better.
出处
《北方药学》
2012年第7期31-32,共2页
Journal of North Pharmacy