期刊文献+

CEUS鉴别诊断肾实质实性良、恶性病变 被引量:2

CEUS in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid renal parenchymal lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨CEUS在鉴别肾实质实性良、恶性病灶中的价值。方法回顾性分析84例患者的85个肾实质实性病灶的CEUS特征,观察良、恶性病灶的CEUS表现。结果恶性病灶主要表现为增强高于周围肾实质(34/59,57.63%)、不均匀增强(46/59,77.97%)及边界清(52/59,88.14%);而良性病灶主要表现为与周围肾实质相等的增强(15/26,57.69%)、均匀增强(20/26,76.92%)及边界不清(20/26,76.92%),差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。根据增强后边界清晰诊断恶性病灶的阴性预测值(20/27,74.07%)和准确率(72/85,84.71%)均较高,而以病灶周边高增强环诊断恶性病灶的阳性预测值较高(39/39,100%)。部分病灶有特殊CEUS灌注模式。结论 CEUS有助于鉴别诊断肾实质实性良、恶性病灶。 Objective To investigate the differential efficacy of CEUS for benign and malignant solid renal parenchymal lesions(SRPL).MethodsCEUS features of 84 SRPL patients with 85 lesions were retrospectively analyzed,and the relation of CEUS features to benign and malignant lesions were evaluated.ResultsMalignant lesions tended to hyper enhanced(34/59,57.63%) and were heterogeneous(46/59,77.97%) with sharp edges(52/59,88.14%),while most benign lesions isoenhanced(15/26,57.69%) and were homogeneous(20/26,76.92%) with unclear edges(20/26,76.92%,P〈0.01).The feature of sharp edge had both higher negative predictive value(20/27,74.07%) and accuracy(72/85,84.71%) of malignant SRPL,and the feature of perilesional hyper-enhancement rim reached the positive predictive value of 100%(39/39).Some lesions had special enhancement mode.ConclusionCEUS are helpful to the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant SRPL.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期1378-1382,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 超声检查 造影剂 实性病灶 Ultrasonography Contrast media Kidney Solid lesion
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献79

共引文献104

同被引文献28

  • 1李凡,杜联芳.超声造影在肾细胞癌分型中的应用价值[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2006,3(6):336-338. 被引量:14
  • 2薛继平,王健,康春松,史凯玲,李朝军.肾脏良恶性占位性病变超声造影增强模式分析[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2013,10(1):68-73. 被引量:5
  • 3Granata A, Floccari F, Logias F, et al. Contrast enhanced ultra- sound in renal diseases[J]. G Ital Nefrol, 2012, 29 Supp157:S25-35.
  • 4Zhou X, Yan F, Luo Y, et al. Characterization and diagnostic confi- dence of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for solid renal tumors[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2011, 37(6) :845--853.
  • 5Wang C, Yu C, Yang F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-en- hanced ultrasound for renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis[]]. Tu- mor Biol, 2014, 35 (7):6343-6350.
  • 6JiangJ, Chen Y, Zhou Y, et al. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features relation to tumor size[]]. EurJ Radiol, 2010, 73(1):162--167.
  • 7Gerst S, Hann LE, Li D, et al. Evaluation of renal masses with con- trast--enhanced ultrasound: initial experience[]]. AJR Am J Roent- genol, 2011, 197(4):897--906.
  • 8Hemmerlein B, Kugler A, Ozisik R, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression, angiogenesis, and necrosis in renal cell carcinomas[J]. Virchows Arch, 2001, 439(5):645--652.
  • 9Yamashita Y, Honda S, Nishiharu T, et al. Detection of pseudocap- sule of renal cell carcinoma with MR imaging and CT[J]. AJR ArnJ Roentgenol, 1996, 166(5):1151-1155.
  • 10Potter SR, Chow GK, Jarrett TW. Percutaneous endoscopic man- agement of urothelial tumors of the renal pelvis[J]. Urology, 2001, 58(3) :457-459.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部