期刊文献+

生存理由量表在中国大学生群体中的应用 被引量:9

Revising the Reasons for Living Inventory for Chinese College Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价生存理由量表(RFL-C)在大学生群体中的信、效度。方法:采用分层随机抽样法,在6所高校中选取48个班级共2166名大学生完成RFL-C、贝克自杀意念等量表。随机抽取140名学生,间隔4周重测RFL-C。结果:①条目与总分的相关在0.231~0.626之间;量表的cronbachα系数在0.74~0.94之间;重测信度在0.65~0.87之间。②探索性因子分析显示,RFL-C由六因子构成,结构模型分析显示六因子模型拟合指数RMSEA=0.04,GFI=0.92,NNFI=0.94,IFI=0.94,CFI=0.94。③RFL-C总分及6个因子分与贝克自杀意念量表总分呈负相关(r=-0.34~-0.10,P<0.05)。除自杀恐惧因子、道德反对因子外,无自杀意念组的生存理由量表总分及其他因子分均高于曾经有自杀意念组、曾经有自杀行为组与现有自杀意念组得分。结论:RFL-C在大学生群体中有良好的信度、效度。 Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the reasons for living inventory.Methods: The sample consisted of 2166 college students completed the reasons for living inventory and BSS at the same time,and 140 college students were selected randomly to take a retest after four weeks.Results: The reasons for living inventory had a good internal reliability(the Cronbach α coefficients ranged from 0.74-0.94),and a good test-retest reliability(the Pearson r ranged from 0.65-0.87).Significant correlations were found between the reasons for living inventory and BSS(r ranged from-0.10 to-0.34,P〈0.05).Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the fit indexes for RMSEA,GFI,NNFI,IFI,CFI were 0.04、0.92、0.94、0.94、0.94.Except the Fear of Suicide and Moral Objections subscale,the total score and other subscale scores of never suicidal group were significantly higher than those of HSI(history of suicidal ideation)、HP(history of parasuicide)、and SI(suicidal ideation);The total score and some subscale scores of HP were significantly higher than those of HIS and SI.Conclusion: The reasons for living inventory is found to have good psychometrics properties and can be used in clinical and theoretical research.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期332-335,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 大学生 生存理由量表 信度 效度 College students The Reasons for Living Inventory Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Frankl VE. From death-camp to existentialism. Boston: Beacon, 1959.
  • 2Des Pres T. The survivor: An anatomy of life in the death camps. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.
  • 3Beaver CW. Hope and suicide in the concentration camp/ ES Shneidman. Death and the college student. New York: Behavioral Publications, 1972.
  • 4Beck AT, Resnik I-ILP, Lettieri D J, et al. The prediction of suicide. Bowie, Md: Charles Press, 1974.
  • 5Beck AT, Weissman A. Measurement of pessimism, the Beck Hopelessness Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,1974, 42(6): 861-865.
  • 6Bedrosian RC, Beck AT. Cognitive aspects of suicidal bi- havior. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior, 1979, 9(2): 87-96.
  • 7Neuringer C. Rigid thinking in suicidal individuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1964, 28:54-58.
  • 8Linehan MM, Chiles JL. Reasons for staying alive when you are thinking of killing yourself: The reasons for living in- ventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983, 51(2): 276-286.
  • 9Lamis DA, Ellis JB, Chumney FL, Dula CS. Reasons for liv- ing and alcohol use among college students. Death Stud, 2009, 33(3): 277-286.
  • 10Connell DK, Meyer RG. The reasons for living inventory and a college population: Adolescent suicidal behaviors, beliefs, and coping skills. J Clin Psychol, 1991, 47(4): 485- 489.

同被引文献111

引证文献9

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部