2Kelman, H. C., & Hovland, C. I. (1953) . Reinstatement" of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 48, 327 - 335.
3Mills, J. , & Jellison, J. M. ( 1967 ) . Effect on opinion change of how desirable the communication is to the audience the communicator addressed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 6, 98 - 101.
4Petty, R. E. , & Wegener, D. T. (1998) . Attitude change: Multi- ple roles for persuasion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.) , The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw - Hill: 323 - 390.
5Pompitakpan, C. ( 2004 ) . The persuasiveness of source credibility : A critical review of five decades' evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 34, 243 -281.
6Johnson, T. , Kaye B.. ( 1995 ) . Cruising is believing? Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journal- ism &MassMedia Quarterly, 75, 325-340.
7Flanagin, A. Metzger, M. (2000) . Perception of internet information credibility. Journalism & Mazs Media Quarterly, 77, 515 -540.
8Egger, F. (2000) . Trust me, I' m an online vendor: Toward a model of trust for e-commence system design. In G. Szwillus & T Turner (eds) : CHI2000 Extended Abstracts: Conference on Human Factors in Computer System, The Hague (NL) , April 1 -6, 2000 101 - 1 -2, ACM Press. Finberg, H, Stone, H. , Lynch, D. (2--1) .Digital journalism credibility study. ,www. journalist, org/Programs/credibility_ study, pdf. 2010 - 9 - 5 访问.
9Fogg, B. ( 2002 ) . Stanford guideline for web credibility: a research summary from the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab. Stanford University. www. webcredibility, org/guidelines. 2010 -9 -5 访问.
10Kelman, H. C. , & Hovland, C. I. (1953) . Reinstatement" of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 327 -335.
