期刊文献+

Ⅱ期颅骨成形实施时间对颅骨缺损患者预后的影响 被引量:1

Influences of the enforcing time of stageⅡcranioplasty on prognosis of skull defeci patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Ⅱ期颅骨成形实施时间对脑外伤颅骨缺损患者的影响,分析实施早期颅骨成形的优越性。方法回顾性分析2004年4月—2010年6月因脑外伤后遗留颅骨缺损采用钛网行颅骨成形术59例的临床资料,其中在颅骨缺损后1~2月行颅骨成形31例,在颅骨缺损后3~6月行颅骨成形28例。对出院时患者的症状、并发症及出院6个月后患者钛网修补的疗效和日常生活运动能力进行评估。结果早期组患者症状缓解率为83.87%,常规组患者症状缓解率为60.71%,二者相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者钛网修补的疗效均为优;早期组患者在ADLⅠ~Ⅱ级方面优于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论脑外伤后颅骨缺损的早期颅骨成形有助于患者症状的缓解、神经功能的康复、日常生活运动能力的提高,所以,在无颅内感染及高颅压的情况下,应尽早对颅骨缺损患者实施颅骨成形术。 Objective To study the influences of the enforcing time of stage II cranioplasty on skull defeci patients after cerebral trauma and analysis on superiority in early stage cranioplasty. Methods A retrospective study was done on data of 59 cases with titanic mesh eranioplasty to skull defeei after head injury from April 2004 to October 2010 June, which were operated 1 to 2 months after skull defeci in 31 cases, 3 to 6 months after skull defeci in 28 cases. To assess the symptoms when patients leaving hospital, complications, curative effect of titanic mesh and the vital motor function of daily life 6 months after leaving hospital. Results The remissive rate of early treatment group was 83.87%, control group was 60.71%, the difference has statistical significance ( P 〈 0.05 ). Both of the curative effects in titanic mesh of the two groups were high quality. Early treatment group was better than control group in ADL I - II, the difference has statistical significance ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Early stage cranioplasty to skull defeci patients cerebral trauma is conducive to ease symptoms, functional rehabilitation of nerve and improve the vital motor function of daily life. So the early stage cranioplasty ought to be done as early as possible without intracranial infection and hypertension.
出处 《临床军医杂志》 CAS 2012年第3期603-605,共3页 Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
关键词 脑外伤 颅骨缺损 颅骨成形 cerebral trauma skull defeci cranioplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献83

共引文献106

同被引文献14

  • 1郭永川 ,索新 ,郭宏川 ,刘伟 ,杨国康 ,崔鹏 ,张金铭 ,李明哲 .颅骨修复体数字化塑形在颅骨成形术中的应用[J].中华神经外科杂志,2005,21(4):252-253. 被引量:99
  • 2杜光勇,杜亚莉,韩彦清,刘佰运.重型颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压后超早期颅骨修补的临床研究[J].中华神经外科杂志,2006,22(6):388-388. 被引量:70
  • 3游潮,尹浩.加强颅骨成形术的基础与临床研究[J].中华创伤杂志,2006,22(10):721-724. 被引量:12
  • 4Wiggins A, Austerberry R, Morrison D, et al. Cranioplasty WithCustom - Made Titanium Plates_14 Years Experience[ J]. Neuro-surgery, 2013,72(2) : 248 -256.
  • 5Rahme R, Weil A G, Sabbagh M, et al. Decompressive craniecto-my is not an independent risk factor for communicating hydroceph-alus in patients with increased intracranial pressure[ J]. Neurosur-gery, 2010,67(3): 675 -678.
  • 6Winkler P A, Stummer W, Linke R,et al. Influence of cranioplas-ty on postural blood flow regulation,cerebrovascular reserve capaci-ty ,and cerebral glucose metabolism [ J ]. Journal of neurosurgery,2000 , 93(1) : 53 -61.
  • 7Li L M, Timofeev I,Czosnyka M,et al. The surgical approach tothe management of increased intracranial pressure after traumaticbrain injury[ J] . Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2010, 111 (3) : 736 -748.
  • 8Kuo JR, Wang CC, Chio CC, et al. Neurological improvement af-ter cranioplasty analysis by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. JChin Neurosic, 2004, 11: 486 -489.
  • 9Fathi A R, MaAacher S,Fandino J. Patient specific “not” com-puter -assisted cranioplasty[ J]. Acta neurochirurgica, 2010, 152(2): 385 -385.
  • 10Rayes M,Colen CB,Bahgat DA,et al. Safety of instrumentationin patients with spinal infection. [ J]. Neurosurg Spine. 2010,12(6):647 -659.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部