2Elmer W G, Elmer S J, Elmer T E. New sirtgle-well standalone gas lift process facilitates Barnett shale fracture~treatment flowback [J]. SPE Production ~ Operations, 2010,26 (1) : 59-64.
3Cheng Y. Impact of water dynamics in fractures on the per- formance of hydraulically fractured wells in gas shale reservoirs [R]. SPE 127863,2010.
4Crahon J W. Flowback performance in intensely naturally frac- tured shale gas reservoirs[R]. SPE 131785,2010.
5King G E, Leonad D. Utilizing fluid and proppant tracer results to analyze multi-fractured well flow hack in shales., a frame- work for optimizing fracture design and application[R] SPE 140105,2011,.
6Clarkson C R. Modeling 2.- phase flowback of multi-fractured horizontal wells completed in shale[R]. SPE 162593,2012.
7Agrawal S,Sharma M M. Impact of liquid loading in hydraulic fractures on well productivity[R]. SPE 163837,2013.
8Wood DD, Schmit BE, Riggins L, Johnson B J, Talley CA. Cana Woodford stimulation practices-a case history[C]//North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, 14- 16 June 2011, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. DOI: http://dx. doi. org/10. 2118/143960-MS.
9Fonseca E, Farinas MJ. Hydraulic fracturing simulation case study and post frac analysis in the Haynesville shale[C]//SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 4-6 February 2013, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. DOI: http: //dx. doi. org/10. 2118/163847-MS.
10Pope C, Peters B, Benton T, Palisch T. Haynesville shale-one op erator's approach to well completions in this evolving play [C]// SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 4-7 October 2009, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. DOI: http: //dx. doi. org/10. 2118/125079-MS.
