摘要
犯罪构成不是起源于某颗终极种子的破土萌芽,而是出现于多种权力因素的矛盾斗争,权力运行方式的变化为犯罪构成的诞生提供了前提。贝林体系的历史贡献不在于其技术性的改造——在"违法"、"有责"之前新增"构成要件",而在于其平衡了立法者、法官与学者的权力关系,把原来的学者型犯罪构成变成了权力平衡型犯罪构成。犯罪构成在自由保障的幌子下,对人的行为进行细致入微的规训,对人的思想进行无微不至的改造。犯罪构成诞生的真正后果在于提供了一套"把人变成主体"的权力—知识。
The origin of the crime constitution system did not mean the ursprung of a ultimate seed, it meant the entstehung of the struggle between various power factors. The transformation in mode of power circulation provided the precondition for the origin. The historic contribution of beling system did not lie in technical reconstruction : adding tatbestand before illegal and responsibility, but in the balancing of power relations between legislator, judge and scholar, and transforming the crime constitution system from scholar type to balanced type. Under the camouflage of safeguarding liberty, the crime constitution system discriminates various people, disciplines people' s conduct meticulously, and alters people' s mentality cagily. The real function of the crime constitution system is providing the power - knowledge to convert people to subject.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期66-75,共10页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金项目(10CFX024)"法治时代刑事政策影响定罪的机理与限度研究"
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(2008SFB2024)"中西刑法文化和定罪制度比较研究"
关键词
犯罪构成
诞生
权力
规训
crime constitution system
origin
power
discipline