期刊文献+

两流T型连铸中间包结构优化 被引量:3

Two-Strand T-type Tundish Configuration Optimization in Continuous Casting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在实验室中以1∶2.5几何相似比建立了两流T型中间包钢液流动的物理模型,保持弗劳德数相等进行物理模拟实验.实验结果表明,原方案中间包结构的最小停留时间为35.00 s,峰值时间为103.75 s左右,平均停留时间约为273.42 s,活塞流体积分数约为17.88%,死区体积分数为29.53%.采用湍控器、一堰和两坝作为该中间包的控流装置,可以大幅度改善中间包的流体流动特性.结构改进后的中间包流体流动特性:最小停留时间达到151.75 s,峰值时间为281.25 s,平均停留时间为354.16 s,活塞流体积分数为55.80%,死区体积分数降低到8.73%. A two-strand T-type tundish model was set up in the laboratory with 1 : 2.5 scale from a tundish prototype. The physical simulation experiment was conducted with Froude number being equal to each other. The results indicated that in the former tundish configuration, the minimum residence time, the peak concentration time, the mean residence time, the plug flow region proportion and the dead volume fraction are 35.00 s, 103.75 s, 273.42 s, 17.88%, 29.53 % ,respectively. The flow characteristics in the tundish with a turbulence inhibitor, a weir and two dams as its flow control devices can greatly be improved. The minimum residence time, the peak concentration time and the average residence time increase to 151.75 s,281.25 s and 354.16 s, respectively in the thundish with the optimization configuration and the plug flow and dead volume fractions are 55.80 % and 8.73 %, respectively.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期983-986,共4页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2007AA04Z194)
关键词 连铸 两流T型中间包 结构优化 物理模拟 控流装置 continuous casting two-strand T-type tundish configuration optimization physical modeling flow control device
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Morales R D, Barreto J J, Lopez-Ramirez S. Melt flow control in a multistrand tundish using a turbulence inhibitor [ J ]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2000,31 (6) :1505- 1515.
  • 2Koria S C, Singh S. Physical modeling of the effects of the flow modifier on the dynamics of molten steel flowing in a tundish[J]. ISU International, 1994,34(10) : 784 - 793.
  • 3Crowley R W, Lawson G D, Jardine B R. Cleanliness improvements using a turbulence-suppressing tundish impact pad[C]//Steelmaking Conference Proceedings. Warrendale, 1995:629 - 636.
  • 4Mazumder D, Yamanoglu G, Guthrie R I L. Hydrodynamic performance of steelmaking tundish systems: a comparative study of three different tundish design[J ]. Steel Research, 1997,68(7) :293 - 300.
  • 5Collur M M, Love D B, Patil B V. Use of flow modifiers to improve performance of a tundish [ C ] // Steelmaking Conference Proceedings. Warrendale, 1997:313-324.
  • 6Morales R D, L6pez-Ramirez S, Palafox-Rams J, et al. Numerical and modeling analysis of fluid flow and heat transfer of liquid steel in a tundish with different flow control devices[J]. ISIJ International, 1999,39(5) :455 - 462.
  • 7Palafox-Rams J, Barreto J, Lopez-Ramire S, et al. Melt flow optimization using turbulenee inhibitors in large volume tundishes[J ]. Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2001,28 (2) : 101 - 109.
  • 8Singh S, Koria S. Physical modeling of steel flow in continuous casting tundish [ J ]. Ironmaking Steelmaking, 1993,20(3) :221 - 230.
  • 9Sahai Y, Burval M. Validity of reynolds and froude similarity criteria for water modeling of melt flow in tundishes[ C]// Proceedings of the Electric Furnace Conference. Warrendale, 1992:469 - 474.
  • 10Sahai Y, Emi T. Melt flow characterization in continuous casting tundish[J], ISIJ International, 1996,36(6):667- 672.

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部