期刊文献+

Venus round trip using solar sail 被引量:1

Venus round trip using solar sail
原文传递
导出
摘要 Trajectory optimization and simulation is performed for Venus round trip (VeRT) mission using solar sail propulsion. Solar gravity is included but atmospheric drag and shadowing effects are neglected in the planet-centered escape and capture stages. The spacecraft starts from the Geostationary orbit (GEt) at a predetermined time to prepare a good initial condition for the Earth-Venus transfer, although the launch window is not an issue for spacecraft with solar sails. The Earth-Venus phase and the return trip are divided into three segments. Two methods are adopted to maintain the mission trajectory for the VeRT mis- sion and then compared through a numerical simulation. According to the first approach, Planet-centered and heliocentric ma- neuvers are modeled using a set of blended analytical control laws instead of the optimal control techniques. The second pro- cedure is the Direct Attitude Angle Optimization in which the attitude angles of the solar sail are adopted as the optimization variables during the heliocentric transfer. Although neither of the two methods guarantees a globally optimal trajectory, they are more efficient and will produce a near-optimal solution if employed properly. The second method has produced a better result for the minimum-time transfer of the VeRT mission demonstrating the effectiveness of the methods in the preliminary design of the complex optimal interplanetary orbit transfers. Trajectory optimization and simulation is performed for Venus round trip (VeRT) mission using solar sail propulsion. Solar gravity is included but atmospheric drag and shadowing effects are neglected in the planet-centered escape and capture stages. The spacecraft starts from the Geostationary orbit (GEO) at a predetermined time to prepare a good initial condition for the Earth-Venus transfer, although the launch window is not an issue for spacecraft with solar sails. The Earth-Venus phase and the return trip are divided into three segments. Two methods are adopted to maintain the mission trajectory for the VeRT mission and then compared through a numerical simulation. According to the first approach, Planet-centered and heliocentric maneuvers are modeled using a set of blended analytical control laws instead of the optimal control techniques. The second procedure is the Direct Attitude Angle Optimization in which the attitude angles of the solar sail are adopted as the optimization variables during the heliocentric transfer. Although neither of the two methods guarantees a globally optimal trajectory, they are more efficient and will produce a near-optimal solution if employed properly. The second method has produced a better result for the minimum-time transfer of the VeRT mission demonstrating the effectiveness of the methods in the preliminary design of the complex optimal interplanetary orbit transfers.
出处 《Science China(Physics,Mechanics & Astronomy)》 SCIE EI CAS 2012年第8期1485-1499,共15页 中国科学:物理学、力学、天文学(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 20110491873) the Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Astronautic Dynamics (Grants No. 2011ADL-DW0201)
关键词 venus round trip solar sail analytical control laws direct attitude angle optimization 太阳帆航天器 金星 地球静止轨道 优化变量 数值模拟 最小时间 太阳引力 阴影效果
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献67

  • 1Alexander, D., Sandman, A., Liewer, P., et al. 2005, in Solar Wind .11/SOHO 16, Connecting Sun and Heliosphere, 592, 663.
  • 2Dachwald, B., Kahle, R., & Wie, B. 2007, Planetary Defense Conference 2007, Washington, D. C. USA, 05-08 March 2007.
  • 3Davis, J., Singla, E, & Junkins, J. L. 2006, Identifying Near-Term Missions and Impact Keyholes for Asteroid 99942 Apophis, in 7th Cranfield Conf. on Dynamics and Control of Systems and Structures in Space. Old Royal Naval College Greenwich, UK: Cranfield University.
  • 4Degtyarev, A., & Ventskovsky, O. 2009, in Proceedings of the 60th International Astronautical Congress; Daejeon.
  • 5Friedman, L., Carroll, W., & Goldstein, R. 1978, AIAA paper, 78.
  • 6Gehrels, T. 1994, in Deflection and Fragmentation of Near-Earth Asteroids (Tucson: The University of Arizona Press).
  • 7Jonathan, R. T. 2003, Physics Education, 38, 218.
  • 8Joris, T. O. 2010, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 33, 823.
  • 9Kim, M. & C. D. Hall, C. D. 2005, Journal of Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 92, 1.
  • 10Koon, W. S., Lo, M. W., & Marsden, J. E. & Ross, S. D. 2007, Dynamical systems, the three-body problem and space mission design (Berlin: Springer) pp. 60-72.

共引文献4

同被引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部