期刊文献+

硼替佐米联合地塞米松与沙利度胺治疗多发性骨髓瘤的效果 被引量:2

EFFICACY OF BORTEZOMIB COMBINED BOTH DEXAMETHASONE AND THALIDOMIDE IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较硼替佐米+地塞米松+沙利度胺(BDT)方案与长春地辛+表柔比星+地塞米松+沙利度胺(VADT)方案治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的临床效果。方法 MM病人67例,应用BDT方案治疗30例,VADT方案治疗37例,均治疗4个疗程,比较两组治疗前、治疗后β2-微球蛋白、免疫球蛋白、骨髓瘤细胞的变化,并比较两组疗效。结果 BDT组及VADT组化疗后β2-微球蛋白、免疫球蛋白、骨髓瘤细胞均低于化疗前,差异有显著性(t=2.837~7.562,P<0.05)。BDT组完全缓解(CR)占13.0%,接近完全缓解(nCR)占20.0%,部分缓解(PR)占53.0%,微小反应(MR)占6.7%,总有效率93.3%;VADT组CR占3.0%,nCR占10.8%,PR占40.5%,MR占16.2%,总有效率70.3%,两组疗效比较,差异有显著性(Hc=51.67,P<0.05)。结论 BDT方案治疗MM效果优于VADT方案,且起效快,可改善病人的预后。 Objective To compare the efficacy of bortezomib combined both dexamethasone and thalidomide (BDT) with vindesine+epirubiein+ dexamethasone+thalidomide (VADT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods BDT the- rapy was used for 67 MM patients, and VADT for 37, a treatment of four courses was carried out in both groups. Changes of ~2- microglobulin, immunoglobnlin, and myeloma cells, before and after treatment, between the two groups were observed and com- pared. Results The levels of l?2-microglobulin, immunoglobulin, and myeloma ceils in both BDT and VADT after chemothera- py were lower than that before the treatment, the differences were statistically significant (t= 2. 837-7. 562, P〈0.05). After four courses of therapy, in BDT group: complete remission (CR) 13. 0X, nearly complete remission (nCR) 20.0%, partial re- sponse (PR) 53.0%, and minimal remission (MR) 6.7%, total effective rate being 93.3% ; in VADT group: that were CR ac- counting for 3.0 %, nCR for 10.8%, PR for 40.5%, and MR for 16.2%, with a total effective rate of 70.3%. The differences between BDT and VADT were statistically significant (Hc=51. 67,P〈40.05). Conelusion BDT is superior to VADT in the treatment of MM in terms of fast action and improvement of patients' prognosis.
出处 《齐鲁医学杂志》 2012年第4期292-294,共3页 Medical Journal of Qilu
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 硼替佐米 地塞米松 沙利度胺 治疗结果 multiple myeloma bortezomib dexamethasone thalidomide treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1PAI.UMBO A, BRINGHEN S, CARAVITA T, et al. Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly pa- tients with multiple myeloma= randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2006,367(9513) :825-831.
  • 2National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology MM(2009 V3). ht tp://www, necn. org.
  • 3BLADE J, SAMSON D, REECE D, et al. Criteria for evalua ring disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Committee of the EBMT Euro- pean Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant [J]. Br J Haematol, 1998,102:1115-1231.
  • 4ANDERSON K C. Multiple myeloma= how far have we come [J]? Mayo Clin Proc, 2003,78:15-17.
  • 5ZAHLTEN H A, GOLDSCHMIDT H, CREMER F W, et al. Preoperative elevation of serum C-reactive protein is pre- dictive for prognosis in myeloma bone disease after surgery [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2006,95(7) :782 -787.
  • 6蒋元强,李建勇,吴雨洁,杨慧,沈云峰,陈丽娟,徐卫,钱思轩,吴汉新,陆化,盛瑞兰.多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血与骨髓中瘤细胞的检测及临床意义[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2006,14(5):908-912. 被引量:4
  • 7汪洪毅,王伟,崔中光,赵洪国,陈兵,杨颉,赵春亭.多发性骨髓瘤预后因素分析[J].齐鲁医学杂志,2006,21(2):114-115. 被引量:4
  • 8HIDESHIMA T, RICHARDSON P, CHAUHAN D, et al. The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 inhibits growth, induces ap- optosis, and overcomes drug resistance in human multiple my eloma cells[J]. Cancer Research, 2001,61(7) :3071-3076.
  • 9HIDESHIMA T, CHAUHAN D, HAYASHI T, et al. Pro teasome inhibitor PS-341 abrogates IL-6 triggered signaling cascades via caspase-dependent downregulation of gp130 in multiple myeloma[J]. Oncogene, 2003,22 (52) : 8386-8393.
  • 10OBENG E A, CARLSON I. M, GUTMAN D M. et al. Pro- teasome inhibitors induce a terminal unfolded protein response in multiple myeloma eells[J]. Blood, 2006,107:4907-4916.

二级参考文献24

  • 1侯健,周帆,张永贞,景燕.硼替佐米治疗复发、难治性多发性骨髓瘤[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2005,24(7):579-581. 被引量:13
  • 2吴雨洁,李建勇,仇海荣,肖冰,张建富,宋君红.四色流式细胞术分析骨髓增生异常综合征原始细胞免疫表型[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2006,14(1):50-53. 被引量:14
  • 3BLAD J,SAMSON D,REECE D,et al.Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation.Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT.European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant[J].Br J Haematol,1998,102:1115-1123.
  • 4DURIE B G M,SALMON S E.A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma[J].Cancer,1975,36:842.
  • 5KANEKO M,KANDA Y,OSHIMA K,et al.Simple prognostic model for patients with mutiple myeloma:a single-center study in Japan[J].Ann Hematol J,2002,81:33.
  • 6BATAILLE R,BOCCADORO M,KLEIN B,et al.C-reactive protein and beta 2-microglobulin produce a simple and powerful myeloma staging system[J].Blood J,1992,80:733.
  • 7WITZIG T E,GERTA M A,LUST J A,et al.Peripheral blood monoclonal plasma cell as a predictor of survival in patients with multiple myeloma[J].Blood J,1996,83:1780.
  • 8BARLOGIE B,SMALLWOOD L,SMITH J,et al.High serum levels of lactic dehydrogenase identify a high-grade lymphoma-like myeloma[J].Ann Intern Med J,1989,110:521.
  • 9Durie BG,Salmon SE.A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma.Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features,response to treatment and survival.Cancer,1975;36:842-845
  • 10Greipp PR,Sanmiguel GF,Durie BG.A new international staging system (ISS) for multiple myeloma (MM) from the International Myeloma Working Group.Blood,2003; 102:118

共引文献12

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部