期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

美国高校教师学术自由风险的治理机制探析 被引量：1

A Study on Governnance Mechanisms of Teachers' Academic Freedom Risks in American Universities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国高校教师的学术自由风险由专业组织和工会组织两种组织进行治理,其治理机制具有网络型外部治理结构和分会型内部治理结构,部门之间是一种扶持和监督反馈式的关系,并以一种超主体的运行方式运行。 Teachers＂ academic freedom risks in American universities are governed by professional organizations and unions,whose governing mechanisms have net external govemnance structure and chapter internal govemnance structure. The mechanisms＂ inter-departmental relationship is supporting and monitoring and reflecting,and runs in a super-subjet way.
作者 孙珂
机构地区 北京师范大学教育学部
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第7期50-57,共8页 Studies in Foreign Education
基金 北京师范大学优秀博士学位论文基金资助项目
关键词 美国:高校教师 学术自由风险 风险治理机制 Key words： America university teachers academic freedom risks risk governnancemechanisms
分类号 G644 [文化科学—高等教育学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1American Association of University Professors. About the AAUP[EB/ULJ. http ://www.aaup.org/ AAUP/about/,2011-08-26/2011-10-27.
  • 2Free Exchange on Campus. About Free Exchange on Campus [EB/OL]. http://www.freeex- changeoncampus.org/index.php?option=com_content&task--view&id= 1 &Itemid=2,2006-02-15/2011-09- 01.
  • 3AAUP. AAUP Constitution [EB/OL]. http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/about/bus/constitution.htm, 2009-06-13/2011-10-28.
  • 4American Association of University Professors. What is Censure [EB/OL]. http://www.aaup.org/ AAUP/issues/AF/censure.htm, 2011--07-11/2011-08-27.

同被引文献29

  • 1余雅风.从美国教育法制看公立大学教师学术自由的原则与界限[J].比较教育研究,2006,27(7):17-21. 被引量：5
  • 2沈文钦.美国联邦最高法院的学术自由判例及其法律意涵[J].比较教育研究,2007,28(1):7-11. 被引量：19
  • 3] Brady v. Board of Trustees, 196 Neb. 226 (1976) [EB/OL. (2016-04-06). https://1.next.west- law.com/Document/I419d8576fe881 ld99439b076efgec4de/View/FullText.html?transitionType=UniqueD - ocItem&contextData=(sc.Default)&userEnteredCitation=196+Neb.+226.
  • 4Sola v. Lafayette Coll., 804 F,2d 40 (1986) [EB/OL]. (2016-04-08). https://1.next.westlaw. com/Document/I80828cfe94d311 d9aTO7f43719c34f0/View/FullText.html?transitionType=UniqueDocItem &contextData=(sc.UserEnteredCitation)&userEnteredCitation=804+F,2d+40+(1986).
  • 5Ameson v. Board of Trustees,210 Ill. App. 3d 844(1991) [EB/OL]. (2016-03-06). https://1. next.westlaw.com/Document/I 14df6779d43911 dga489ee624fl f6e 1 a/View/FullText.html ?transitionType= UniqueDocItem&contextData=(sc.Search)&userEnteredCitation=569+N.E,2d+252.
  • 6Browzin v. Catholic University of America,527 F,2d 843 (1975)[EB/OLJ. (2016-O4-12). https: //1.next.westlaw.eom/Doeument/Ib5843e9c909511 d98e8tb00d6c6a02dd/View/FullText.html?transition Tye=UniqueDtem&entextData=(s.UserEnteredCitatin)&userEntredCitatin=527+F,2d+843.
  • 7Cary Nelson. No University is an Island:Saving Academic Freedom [M]. New York: New York University Press, 2010:195.
  • 8Adler v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 342 U.S. 485 (1952) [EB/OL]. (2016-03- 16). https://1.next.westlaw 409bedl 1 d9bddl cfdd544ca3a4/View/FullText.html? transitionType=UniqueDochem&contextData= (sc .UserEnteredCitation) &userEnteredCitation=342 + U.S. + 485.
  • 9Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957) [EB/OL]. (2016-03-26). https:#l.next.west- law.comocument/I0a3df83a9bf011 d991 d0ec6654fl 2d4d/View/FullText.html?transitionType=UniqueD - ocItem&contextData=( sc.UserEnteredCitation ) &userEnteredCitation=354+U.S. + 234.
  • 10Keyishian v. Board of Regents of the University of New York, 385 U.S. 609 (1967) [EB/OL] (2016- 04- 26). https://1.next.westlaw.com/Document/IbSbdcf5b9al01 ld9bddlcfdd544ca3a4/View/Full- Text.html?transitionType=UniqueDochem&contextData=(sc.UserEnteredCitation) 385+U.S.+609#co_pp_sp_780_609.
外国教育研究
2012年 第7期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部