摘要
胡恒认为,"集体遗忘"并非是"集体记忆"的结果,它还是其开端和动机。"集体遗忘"的几种形态都与空间相关,都涉及事件、地点。尤其是记忆介质在场的"遗忘",它直接将历史拉入现实。这使得记忆研究成为探讨历史与当下之间关系的通道。
As far as collective memory is concerned to Hu Heng,amnesia is not the residue of memory;on the contrary,memory results from amnesia.Categorizing collective memories into three forms,he explores the possibility of constructing an amnesia theatre in an effort to establish the connections between past and present,and to make history an integral part in our lives.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第7期130-134,137,共5页
Academic Monthly
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"城市哲学和城市批评史研究"(11&ZD089)的阶段性成果
南京大学人文基金资助