期刊文献+

当代集体行动理论的发展:从社会崩溃到政治过程 被引量:6

Development of Contemporary Collective Action Theory from Social Breakdown to Political Process
原文传递
导出
摘要 在当代集体行动理论的发展中,方法论变革是理论创新的直接动力。集体行动研究先后出现了社会崩溃理论、资源动员理论和政治过程理论等多种模式。这些理论分别从社会心理、个体理性和政治过程出发,考察集体行动的约束结构或资源条件。推进集体行动理论的深入发展,需要综合分析社会结构、行动者理性和文化认同之间的关系,实现多种研究路径的对话交流。 In the development course of contemporary collective action theory, changes in methodology are the direct incentives of theoretical innovation. Researchers have brought forward various theories, such as the social breakdown model, the resource mobilization model and the political process model. These theories have examined the constraint structure or resource condi- tions of collective action from the angles of social psychology, individual rationality and political process respectively. In order to propel further development of collective action theory, synthetic analysis of the interaction among social structure, rationality of actors and cultural identity is nec- essary. In this way, exchange and dialogue of the results by a variety of research approaches can be achieved.
作者 高春芽
出处 《教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第7期65-72,共8页 Teaching and Research
基金 2009年国家社科基金青年项目"西方集体行动理论发展跟踪研究"(项目号:09CZZ006)阶段性成果
关键词 集体行动 社会崩溃 资源动员 政治过程 collective action social breakdown resource mobilization political process
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Useem, Bert. Breakdown Theories of Collec tive Action[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 24, 1998.
  • 2Useem, Bert. Solidarity Model, Breakdown Mod- el and the Eoston Anti--Busing Movement[J]. A- merican Sociological Review, Vol. 45, No. 3, 1980.
  • 3[法]埃米尔·迪尔凯姆.自杀论[M].冯韵文译.北京:商务印书馆,1996.
  • 4Davies, Jame. Toward a Theory of Revolution[J]. American Sociological Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1962.
  • 5Olson, Mancur. Rapid Growth as Destabilizing Forc[J]. Journal of Economic History, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1963.
  • 6[英]卡尔·波兰尼.大转型[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2007.
  • 7Smelser, Neil. Theory of Collective Behavior[M]. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962.
  • 8Komhauser, Williarr:The Politics of Mass Soci- ety[M]. Glencoe: The Free Press, 1959.
  • 9Eschen, Donald Von; Kirk, Jerome and Pinard, Mauric: The Organizational Substructure of Disorderly Politics [J]. Social Forces, Vol. 49, No. 4, 1971.
  • 10Gusfield, Joseph, Mass Society and Extremist Politics[J]. American Sociological Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1962.

二级参考文献7

  • 1McAdam, Doug 1999, Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930 - 1970. Chicago: Universily of Chicago Press. Second Edition.
  • 2McCarthy,John D.& Mayer N.Zald 1973.The Trend of Social Movements in America:Professionalization and Resource Mobilization.Morristown.N.J.:General Learning Press.
  • 3Meyer,John W.& Brian Rowan 1977.“Institutionalized Organizations:Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.”American Journal of Sociology 83.
  • 4Jenkins,Joseph Craig & Charles Perrow 1977.“Insurgency of the Powerless:Farm Worker Movements (1946-1972).”American Sociological Review 42.
  • 5Putnam,Robert D.1993.Making Democracy Work:Civic Traditions in Modern Italy,Princeton,N.J.:Princeton University Press.
  • 6Snyder,David & Charles Tilly 1972.“Hardship and Collective Violence in France,1830-1860.”American Sociological Review 37.
  • 7Stryker,Sheldon & Kevin D.Vryan 2003.The Symbolic Interactionist Frame.In John Delamater(ed.).Handbook of Social Psychology.NY:Kluwer/Plenum.

共引文献111

同被引文献85

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部