期刊文献+

预测前列腺癌根治术后并发症风险列线图的建立 被引量:9

Construction of a nomogram predicting the risk of peri-operative complications after open radical prostatectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的采用标准化的评分系统分析前列腺癌根治术围手术期并发症的危险因素及构建预测模型。方法选取2007年6月至2011年6月行前列腺癌根治术的患者240例,年龄50~82岁,平均70岁。术前均经活检病理诊断为前列腺癌。Gleason评分:〈7分95例,≥7分145例。临床分期:T1期1例(0.4%),T2a期5例(2.1%),T2b期7例(2.9%),T2a期162例(67.5%),T3a期26例(10.8%),T3b期39例(16.3%)。患者围手术期(术后30d内)并发症情况依据Clavien—Dindo标准按严重程度分级,II度以上并发症归为有临床意义的并发症,其中直肠损伤4例(1.6%),伤口感染5例(2.0%),深静脉血栓3例(1.2%),尿漏12例(5.O%),淋巴瘘11例(4.5%),心肌梗死14例(5.8%),二次手术4例(1.6%)。采用倒退法多元Logistic回归筛选危险因素,建立预测围手术期II度及以上并发症的列线图。结果围手术期并发症的预测因子中,体质指数(bodymassin—dex,BMI)是独立的预后因素(OR值为0.804,P〈0.05)。通过变量筛选最终的模型包括BMI、N分期、术中出血〉200ml。模型的内部验证显示分辨度C—index为0.633,符合度平均绝对差为0.028。最终根据多因素分析结果绘制了便于临床应用的列线图。结论基于标准化的并发症评估数据,我们建立了预测前列腺癌围手术期临床显著并发症的列线图,该列线图在内部验证中显示了良好的效力,有助于前列腺癌个体化的手术治疗。 Objective To construct and evaluate a nomogram for predicting the risk of peri-operative complications after radical retro-pubic prostatectomy (RRP) with standard classification criteria. Methods The peri-operative complications and clinieopathological data of 240 patients (50 -82 years old) who had undergone RRP for prostate cancer from June 2006 to June 2011 were retrospectively collected. GI- eason score: 95 cases 〈 7; 145 patients ≥7; Clinical staging: cT1 is 1 case (0. 4%), T2a 5 cases (2.1%), T2b 7 cases (2. 9%), T2a 162 cases (67. 5%), T3a 26 cases (10. 8%), T3b 39 cases (16. 3% ). The peri-operative complications (in 30 days after surgery) were classified by Clavien-Dindo Classification system ( the occurrence rates are as follows: rectum injury 1.6% , wound infection 2.0% , deep venous thrombosis 1.2% , urinary leak 5.0% , lymphocele 4.5% , myocardial infarction 5.8% , second look operation 1. 6% ), and a logistic regression model was used to construct the nomogram. Results BMI, N staging and Blood loss more than 200ml during surgery were independent prognostic factors of RRP morbidity in multivariate logistic regression. The nomogram predicting the risk of peri-operative complications showed relative good concordance index (0. 633 ) and good calibration. Conclusions Based on the clinicopathological factors, a nomogram to predict the probability of peri-operative complications in patients undergone RRP was constructed. This statistical tool may be beneficial in judging operation risk and help consulting with patient before or after surgery.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期499-503,共5页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 前列腺癌根治术 并发症 危险因素 列线图 Radical prostatectomy Complication Risk factors Nomogram
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1叶定伟.前列腺癌的流行病学和中国的发病趋势[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(6):362-364. 被引量:168
  • 2肖文军,叶定伟,姚旭东,张世林,戴波,张海梁,沈益君,朱耀,朱一平,施国海,马春光,秦晓健,林国文.前列腺癌根治术中盆腔淋巴结清扫的意义及并发症防治[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2010,31(11):770-773. 被引量:13
  • 3Novara G, Ficarra V, D'Elia C, et al. Prospective evaluation with standardised criteria for postoperative complications after ro- botic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol, 2010, 57: 363-370.
  • 4Hisasue S, Takahashi A, Kato R, et al. Early and late complica- tions of radical retropubie prostatectomy: Experience in a single institution. Jpn J Clin Oneol, 2004, 34: 274-279.
  • 5Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Din- do classification of surgical complications five-year experience.Ann Surg, 2009, 250: 187-196.
  • 6Trinh QD, Sehmitges J, Sun M, et al. Open radical prostateeto- my in the elderly: a case for concern?. BJU Int, 2012, 109: 1335-1340.
  • 7Loeb S, Roehl KA, Helfand BT, et al. Complications of open radical retropubic prostatectomy in potential candidates for active monitoring. Urology, 2008, 72: 887-891.
  • 8Chalasani V, Martinez CH, Lim D, et al. Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes during the learning curve for ro- bot-assisted radical prostateetomy. Can Urol Assoe J, 2010, 4: 250-254.
  • 9Stranne J, Lodding P. Inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy: risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Urol, 2011, 8 : 267-273.
  • 10Chalasani V, Martinez CH, Lim D, et al. Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes during the learning curve for ro- bot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J, 2010, 4: 250-254.

二级参考文献4

共引文献178

同被引文献80

  • 1曾星,胡志全,王志华,李恒,庄乾元,叶章群.改良式Bricker回肠膀胱术与经典式Bricker回肠膀胱术并发症的比较[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(1):57-60. 被引量:5
  • 2高小峰,张威,彭泳涵,李凌,施晓磊,刘敏,孙颖浩.输尿管软镜碎石术后SIRS发生的高危因素分析[J].泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2014,6(4):5-9. 被引量:29
  • 3赵晓风,孙晓飞,吕志红,王军,刘亮.经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切和经尿道前列腺电切治疗良性前列腺增生的临床结果比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(9):628-630. 被引量:126
  • 4Xie CY, Zhu GB, Wang XH, et al. Five-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2012, 53(4): 734-41.
  • 5Yoon PD, Chalasani V, Woo HH. Use of Clavien-Dindo classification in reporting and grading complications after urological surgical procedures: analysis of 2010 to 2012[J]. J Urol, 2013, 190(4): 1271-4.
  • 6Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results ofa survey[J], Ann Surg, 2004, 240(2): 205-13.
  • 7Oranusi CK, Nwofor A, Oranusi 10. Complication rates of open transvesical prostatectomy according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system[J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2012,15(1): 34-7.
  • 8Clavien PA, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience [J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(2): 187-96.
  • 9Elkoushy MA, Luz MA, Benidir T, et al. Clavien classification in urology: Is there concordance among post-graduate trainees and attending urologists[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2013, 7(5/6): 179-84.
  • 10World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epi-demic. 2008: warning about the dangers of tobacco [ R]. Gene-va, 2008.

引证文献9

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部