期刊文献+

盆腔双叶拉钩在男性复杂盆腔膀胱和前列腺血管蒂处理中的应用 被引量:1

Application of pelvic double-slice retractor in the division of bladder and prostate pedicles in male patients with complicated pelvic anatomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨男性复杂盆腔患者膀胱和前列腺血管蒂处理方法的改进效果。方法男性膀胱癌患者43例。年龄49~75岁,平均58岁。30例体质指数(BMI)28.8~31.3kg/m2,平均29.7kg/m2。曾行膀胱部分切除术16例(同时行输尿管膀胱再植术4例)。43例均行B超、cT、膀胱镜检查。肿瘤单发8例,多发35例。肿瘤最大径1.6~4.5cm,平均3.6cm。均经病理证实为膀胱癌。临床分期:T2期30例,T3期13例。前列腺癌37例。年龄54~72岁,平均65岁。BMI29.5—32.7ks/m2,平均30.6kg/m2。临床分期:T2a期10例,T2a。期25例,T3a期2例。患者分别行根治性膀胱切除术(RC)及顺行根治性前列腺切除术(ARP),术中辅助应用盆腔双叶拉钩进行膀胱及前列腺血管蒂显露。结果80例手术均顺利完成。在盆腔双叶拉钩提供的良好显露条件下,膀胱及前列腺血管蒂处理准确、快速。无直肠及盆壁组织损伤。RC组处理血管蒂时间9—14min,平均12min;出血量20~50m1,平均30ml。ARP组处理血管蒂时间5—9min,平均7min;出血量10~35ml,平均20ml。结论盆腔双叶拉钩结构简单、操作方便、使用性能好,男性复杂盆腔患者ARP和RC术中辅助应用盆腔双叶拉钩行膀胱及前列腺血管蒂显露效果满意。 Objective To evaluate effectiveness of the applying pelvic double-slice retractor in the division of bladder and prostate pedicles in male patients with previous surgery history during radical eysteetomy (RC) and anterograde radical prostatectomy (ARP). Methods The pelvic double-slice retractor was used to expose the bladder and prostate pedicles in 43 RC (30 cases with BMI 〉 28 kg/m2 , 16 cases had previous partial cystectomy) and 37 ARP (all cases with BMI 〉 28 kg/m2 ). Results The pelvic double-slice retractor provided excellent exposure for the division of bladder and prostate pedicles. The handling of bladder and prostate pedicles became easy and safe without unnecessary bleeding and injury to the rectum. The median operating time to control the pedicles during RC and ARP were 12 min and 7 rain, and the average blood loss were 30 ml and 20 ml, respectively. Conclusion The use of pelvic double-slice retractor for the exposure of the bladder and prostate pedicles is simple and effective in male patients with complicated pelvic anatomy during RC and ARP.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期512-514,共3页 Chinese Journal of Urology
基金 天津市科委科技支撑项目(11ZCGYSY02300)
关键词 盆腔双叶拉钩 血管蒂 显露 膀胱切除术 前列腺切除术 Pelvic double-slice retractor Vascular pedicle Exposure Cystectomy Prostatectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Stein JP, Skinner DG. Surgical atlas. Radical cystectomy. BJU Int, 2004, 94: 197-221.
  • 2Sciarra A, Cristini C, Von Heland M, et al. Randomized trial comparing an anterograde versus a retrograde approach to open radical prostatectomy: results in terms of positive margin rate. Can Urol Assoc J, 2010, 4: 192-198.
  • 3Lowrance WT, Rumohr JA, Chang SS, et al. Contemporary open radical cystectomy: analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol, 2008, 179: 1313-1318.
  • 4Leliveld AM, Doornweerd BH, Bastiaannet E, et al. Treatment and outcome in muscle invasive bladder cancer: a population- based survey. BJU Int, 2009, 104: 628-632.
  • 5Hong SK, Chang IH, Han BK, et al. Impact of variations in bony pelvic dimensions on performing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology, 2007, 69: 907-911.
  • 6黄健,黄海,姚友生,谢文练,许可慰,郭正辉,江春,韩金利.腹腔镜与开放性膀胱全切原位回肠代膀胱术的疗效比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(3):172-175. 被引量:54

二级参考文献6

  • 1Beecken WD,Wolfram M,Engl T,et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic ileal neobladder. Eur Urol,2003,44:337-339.
  • 2Gerber GS. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol,2004,18:576-577.
  • 3Kulkarni JN, Pramesh CS, Rathi S, et al. Long-term results of orthotopic neobladder reconstruction after radical cystectomy. BJU Int,2003,91:485-488.
  • 4Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Robinson MH, Scholefield JH. Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Am J Surg,2000,179:500-507.
  • 5Targarona EM,Balague C,Knook MM,et al. Laparoscopic surgery and surgical infection. Br J Surg,2000,87:536-544.
  • 6黄健,姚友生,许可慰,郭正辉,江春,韩金利.腹腔镜下膀胱全切除原位回肠代膀胱术(附15例报告)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2004,25(3):175-179. 被引量:100

共引文献53

同被引文献12

  • 1徐勇,张志宏,乔宝民,赵耀瑞,牛远杰,方平,权昌益.耻骨后解剖性根治性前列腺切除术的技术改进[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(7):486-489. 被引量:7
  • 2FU Q,MOUL JW,SUN L.Contemporary radical prostatectomy[J].Prostate Cancer,2011(2011):645030.
  • 3TOSOIAN JJ,LOEB S.Radical retropubic prostatectomy:comparison of the open and robotic approaches for treatment of prostate cancer[J].Rev Urol,2012,14(1-2):20-27.
  • 4CHANG SS,COOKSON MS.Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy[J].Urology,2006;68:249-256.
  • 5SCIARRA A,CRISTINI C,VON HELAND M,et al.Randomized trial comparing an anterograde versus a retrograde approach to open radical prostatectomy:results in terms of positive margin rate[J].Can Urol Assoc J,2010,4(3):192-198.
  • 6SCIARRA A,GENTILE V,DE MATTEIS A,et al.Longterm experience with an anatomical anterograde approach to radical prostatectomy:results in terms of positive margin rate[J].Urol Int,2008,80:151-156.
  • 7SCHAEFFER EM,PARTIN AW,LEPOR H,et al.Radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy[M]WEIN AJ,KAVOUSSI LR.CampbellWalsh Urology,10th ed.Philadelphia:Saunders,2012:2821.
  • 8ZHANG Z,ZHANG C,LIU R,et al.New retractor facilitates exposure of the vascular pedicles in Chinese men with complex pelvis during radical cystectomy[J].Jpn J Clin Oncol,2013,43(2):189-192.
  • 9WALZ J,BURNETT AL,COSTELLO AJ,et al.Acritical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy[J].Eur Urol,,2011,57:179-192.
  • 10FICARRA V,NOVARA G,ARTIBANI W,et al.Retropubic,laparoscopic and robotassisted radical prostatectomy:a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies[J].Eur Urol,2009,55:1037-1063.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部