期刊文献+

为传统名药“黄檗”和“黄栌”正名 被引量:1

Name correction for traditional herbs of “Huangbo” and “Huanglu”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "黄檗"和"黄栌"均为传统名药;但近现代对其原植物的考订有误。故需详加考辨,并为其正名。经文献考证和实物比对,确认黄檗即芸香科植物Phellodendron chinense Schneid.var.glabriusculum Schneid.,黄栌即漆树科植物Cotinus coggygria Scop.var.cinerea Engl.。并对这两种植物汉名出典的标注问题进行了探讨。 "Huangbo"and"Huanglu" are both traditional herbs. However, mistakes in their original plant researches do exist. Further textual researches are conducted for the purpose of correct use of their plant names. Based on references research and specimen comparison, the original plants of "Huangbo'and"Huanglu" are confirmed as Phellodendron chinense Schneid. var. glabriusculum Schneid. and Cotinus coggygria Scop. var. cinerea Engl. re-spectively. Researches are also given to the book commentaries for their first Chinese names.
出处 《河北林果研究》 2012年第2期189-193,共5页 Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research
关键词 传统中药 黄檗 黄栌 产地 汉名出典 标注 traditional herbs "Huangbo" "Huanglu" origin the book of the first Chinesename used book commentaries
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1清·顾观光辑.神农本草经[M].杨鹏举校注.第2版.北京:学苑出版社,1992:175.
  • 2唐·苏敬.新修本草[M].新1版.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1959:165-166,161-162.
  • 3宋·唐慎微原著.宋·艾晟刊订,大观经史证类备急本草[M].尚志钧点校.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,2003:436-437,532-533.
  • 4[日]森立之.本草经考注[M].古文辉等点校.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2005:407-410.
  • 5[日]松村任三.植物名汇·前编·汉名之部[M],东京:丸善株式会社,1921:259.
  • 6明·朱檑著.救荒本草校释与研究[M].王家葵,张瑞贤,李敏校注.北京:中医古籍出版社,2007:219-220.
  • 7郑万钧.中国树木志:第4册:[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2004:4230.

共引文献3

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

;
使用帮助 返回顶部