摘要
本文系统梳理了学会评估的相关理论和已有的学会评估实践活动,比较了这些评估活动中存在的评估主体、评估内容和评估方法存在的差异,指出学会的评估活动应充分考虑学会的本质属性,而且应不断调整学会的评估指标,同时,学会评估主体也应多元化。
This paper systematically analyzed the relevant assessment theory and existing practice of learned society, compared the differences of principal body, content and methods for these assessment activities, pointed out that the assessment activities of learned society should take full account its essential attribute, and continue to adjust the assessment indicators, meanwhile, the principal body for assessment should also be diversified.
出处
《学会》
2012年第7期13-16,共4页
关键词
学会
评估
体系
learned society
assessment
system